It doesn't matter. The Bush Family do not recognize people with less than a billion dollars as being even human. Let alone American.
Go Team Bush Go
2007-05-07 08:10:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by ShortBus43 2
·
5⤊
2⤋
Did the united states go to war in iraq thinking that only al-quieda would attack the US??? I do not think so. Do you even consider that we have only lost 3000 people over the course of the entire war??? compare that to any other war and the numbers arent even close. Even if it takes 4 more years in Iraq, the right answer is to wait until it is stable no matter what type of government is chosen in Iraq by its people. Most of the people that die in Iraq are the shiites and Sunnis killing each other. Dont be fooled by the numbers just because you think that republicans are the cause for all wrong-doings worldwide. Dont just read an article and pretend you know what your talking about.
2007-05-07 15:12:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by amorudence 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
To answer your question.... regardless of what you call the insurgents, they are the ones fighting against Iraqi control of their country, not Bush... If you know anything about history, the Japanese did not invite Democracy and thousands of US soldiers were killed After the war.. good thing we didn't cut and run then , we shouldn't now. People keep saying Bush should do what the Iraqi's want.. Well, they Don't want the US to give up and give a date of surrender..Maybe people should get ticked off at the insurgents and maybe not at the coalition forces.....Every time someone sympathizes with the insurgents and attack Bush , they embolden the enemy..Its like telling them you support their efforts, maybe you should support the good guys for a change and not the suicide bombers.
2007-05-07 15:24:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by bereal1 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Any idiot would have realized that they should at least SKETCH OUT a plan B in case the parade didn't go as planned. I find it hard to believe that Bush's team is simply incompetent. They wanted a mess in the Middle East, for reasons which are unclear, but it's becoming more and more obvious that this is the case. They're supporting Shiite militias in Iraq and giving funding to Sunni militias in Iran and all over the Middle East, and I guarantee you some of those resources are going straight to Iraq and Afghanistan.
2007-05-07 15:14:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Aleksandr 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's impossible to say how many Americans are going to die in a given period, let alone to afix blame for those deaths, but, you could probably safely count on the casualty rates in Iraq staying relatively stable for the remainder of Bush's term, assuming, of course, that Congress can't get it's act together to end the war before then. So, possibly something in the neighborhood of another thousand?
2007-05-07 15:16:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you honestly believe the killing will stop If the US leaves Iraq? If that is the case then Iraq isn't in a civil war. Is the killings only the places the US military is actively engaged? When the US left Vietnam did peace & harmany become the norm? Your memory is different than mine. I remember boat people, re-education camps, & killing fields.
When will the advocates for defeet start offering the Iraqi people a better solution?
2007-05-07 15:25:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by viablerenewables 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well bush could just take all the troops out and then let the insurgents come over here and attack us again, and again, and again. if thats what you want, go ahead, be a terd. do you think that war is a fun thing to do. do you think bush was just like Hey i dont want to admit to my mistake, so lets just kill more military personnel. No, do you know that "insurgents" gather every friday to wish death upon you. sure you do. who cares who they are affliated with. they still want to kill you. compare the deaths in WWII to iraq. you are blowing up on americans being killed. no one here wants them do die, but they do so you can sit on your computer and ***** about how it might take longer to try and eliminate a giant threat against your freedom, say what you want, but you can believe this, if we dont fight now, your childrens children will be drafted into fighting a terrorist force much bigger than what it is now if we just "pull" out now. have fun with your freedom
2007-05-07 15:17:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by David M 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
WHAT HAPPENED TO "WE WILL NEVER FORGET"? DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT HAPPENED ON SEPTEMBER11TH? I THINK ALOT OF PEOPLE HAVE FORGOTTEN THE REASON WHY WE ARE IN THIS WAR. WE HAVE NOT HAD A MAJOR ATTACK ON U.S SOIL SINCE THEN. WE MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT. IN WORLD WAR II, THE DEATH TOLL WAS ABOUT 50 MILLION. WE HAVE BEEN IN THIS WAR SINCE WHEN? I THINK 3,000 TROOPS IS A LOW NUMBER FOR THE AMOUNT OF YEARS THAT WE HAVE BEEN FIGHTING THIS WAR. EVERYONE OF THE TROOPS VOLUNTEERED TO BE WHERE THEY ARE TODAY. THEY WANTED TO FIGHT FOR OUR COUNTRY, FIGHT FOR OUR FREEDOM, AND FIGHT FOR THE PEOPLE THAT DIED IN THE WORLD TRADE CENTER. I DON'T FEEL THAT WE SHOULD BE QUITERS AND PULL OUT OF IRAQ. WE SHOULD STAY AND FIGHT TILL WE ACHIEVE VICTORY. THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES ARE NOT QUITTERS. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT ANYONE ELSE BUT, I WILL NEVER FORGET WATCHING THE PLANES HIT THE TOWERS ON TV AND THE FEELING I FELT WATCHING IT.
2007-05-07 15:47:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by STACEY 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jeez don't you get as tired of the same old, same old as your readers do! War is hell, it isn't over yet and let's wait till the fat Iragi lady sings!
2007-05-07 15:19:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Many more. He doesn't think he is wrong. Him and his PNAC cronies think it is ok to drain the US treasury so that they can can line their pockets with billions of US tax dollars.
2007-05-07 15:16:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by ♥ Cassie ♥ 5
·
2⤊
1⤋