It sickens me when I read about the extravagance being lavished on the visit by the "queen" - so called- at taxpayer's expense. Do the majority of people not object to the federal aristocracy that our federal government has become? We rejected the notion of "royalty" in this country, recognizing that there is no birthright that makes one person automatically more important than another. Yet our government, in typical fashion, knows no bounds when it comes to the expenses that are lavished upon just such a person. Is there no way we can elect people to office who will fight the people's fight, which is to protect us from a government elite and this type of conduct and abuse of taxpayer's dollars.
P.S. It appears that Ms. Laura didn't realize that when people referred to her husband as King George, it was meant as a disparaging remark.
2007-05-07
07:17:12
·
3 answers
·
asked by
inquisitor-one
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics