the Wolfowiz and Gonzales Scandal with Bush backing these corrupt people, Bush tying up Congress by vetoing bringing our troops home from Iraq - all the while telling us that we should expect more casaulties and his plans for Immagration reform at a complete standstill???
What a joke right?
2007-05-07 06:33:57 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, honey, you fell for the liberal propaganda again.
2007-05-07 06:38:28 · answer #1 · answered by LoneStar 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋
I think you nailed it. Please don't leave out the DC Madam,
since the person Bush put in charge of getting rid of
prostitution was one of her clients.
It does seem like a joke, but it's hard to laugh at.
It's even harder to believe that when Bush was governer,
he said - no war should be planned without first having
an exit strategy - yet, that's what he said about Bosnia.
2007-05-07 06:43:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
interior the aftermath of the 9/11 assaults and united statesa.'s next invasion of Afghanistan, the Bush administration became a lot extra centred on battling worldwide terrorism. Their time-honored goals weren't the terrorists themselves, however the governments who supported them. Of maximum precedence to Bush replaced into Iraq, which had long been accused of having a covert weapons of mass destruction application and in all probability even deliberate to . The rhetoric that got here from his administration replaced into that the Iraqi government below Saddam Hussein could be prepared to dispense its arsenal to anti-American terrorist businesses, going as far as alleging ties between Iraq and al-Qaeda. not one of the information presented via intelligence businesses implicated Hussein in any of this, and the Bush administration went out of its thank you to discredit any information to the different. i think of George W. Bush's intentions have been helpful. He observed Saddam Hussein as an exceedingly ruthless tyrant who should not be allowed to rule a united states of america - and rightly so. Saddam Hussein stepped forward a pervasive cult of character around himself, performed and tortured a infinite variety of harmless people on the mere suspicion of dissidence, devoted genocide against the Kurdish people interior the north via using chemical gas, brutally repressed the Iraqi Shi'ite community, invaded 3 neighbouring countries with out provocation (Iran, Kuwait, and temporarily Saudi Arabia), released missile assaults against Israel for no different reason than to income community help, and backed terrorist businesses against his political opponents. hundreds of hundreds (if no longer tens of millions) died on the palms of the Hussein regime in Iraq. yet Bush's justification for invading the country replaced into defective and the conflict as an entire replaced into unwell-conceived. they did no longer evaluate the Sunni-Shia conflict that could practically surely engulf Iraq afterwards, and defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld did no longer make any attempt to devise out the positioned up-invasion component to the conflict. the effect replaced right into a bloody sectarian conflict that keeps to at present time.
2016-12-28 16:32:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I blame the Dems for dividing this country. The Gonzales thing is a non-issue that the media has decided to go to the mat for.
Makes me sick!
2007-05-07 06:43:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush will be the President for the rest of his term,and no matter how much whinning you,and the rest of the Democratic Communist Workers party belly ache about it. So learn to live with it.
2007-05-07 06:44:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush will go down in history as the worst we have ever had. He's no joke. He is scary. He is also a liar, corrupt, incompetent, greedy, and arrogant.
2007-05-07 06:41:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
what do you mean the Iraqi war dividing America? we're almost totally united against it. as far as the Bush Admin unraveling, GWB was never wrapped too tight in the first place.
2007-05-07 06:40:05 · answer #7 · answered by Alan S 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't see it coming apart at all. I hear a lot of noise, and accusations, but not coming apart. Americans are like family. We fight we bicker, but when threatened we come together in an unbeatable force. No joke here, move on.
2007-05-07 06:40:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
they found nothing in 8 firing they found nothing on bush they have to make up stuff to get to rove and Chaney.
2007-05-07 07:23:25 · answer #9 · answered by Jeremy P 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
george bush is the most dangerous president in US history.we will forever be blackmarked for having had him in office
2007-05-07 06:38:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋