I would not support him, but at least he wouldn't make such a fool of himself
2007-05-08 09:52:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is a cancerian. Cancerians do not take every little thing as seriously as you do (I am a cancer too) Have you ever spoken before several million people and news media while trying to appear friendly and comfortable? You would be shocked at former presidents lack of speech speaking (not writing, they are written by specialists) I prefer to read my own speeches written by myself-I memorize as much as possible and only use index cards for major portions of the speech. He doesn't do that, cancers are well know for improvisation. I support him because he is my president. Mangling a sentence? Clinton never has but he misused his office by seducing an intern. She should have sued his *** off for harassment. Have you never mangled a sentence? Sometimes the mind goes faster than the mouth. We used to say: Make a sentence out of that.
2007-05-07 05:06:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by dtwladyhawk 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are, and have been, plenty of intellectuals on the right and in the Republican party. My opposition in those cases has been based on politics, not intellect. Bush could become the smartest man on the planet, but if his views are unchanged, I'll continue to oppose him.
Bill Clinton was our smartest president in, arguably, the last 47 years (I'll give Ike credit for being as smart or smarter). Am I right to think that you're a Bill Clinton opponent, all the same?
2007-05-07 05:04:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
What most people don't realize is that he is an intellectual. The only thing is that he is camera shy and not an orator. Which would you rather have someone who everyone loves but screws over the entire country as president(ie. Clinton, Jackson, Carter, FDR, LBJ, Woodrow Wilson, etc.) or someone who is hated in their time but whose value to his country shows when written in the annals of history as a great president(Bush, Lincoln, etc).
By your logic no one with an autistic spectrum disorder should because president. No one with a speech impediment. I mean Gullianni has kind of a lisp so should that disqualify him?
2007-05-07 05:17:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If Bush were an intellectual person he would not keeping standing by the bone headed decisions he's made in the past.
Intellectual people are smart enough to know when they've made a mistake(s).
By the way, I voted for him. I'm sorry....I make a mistake.
2007-05-07 05:05:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kita 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
If his most charming attribute wasn't mangling his sentences then his least charming of attracting the support of the people who would otherwise not support those who had difficulty making themselves understood that he is the spokesperson for would reiterate that which he is most famous for undiscombobulating his wasaname...
2007-05-07 05:08:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To totally avoid that question... Being more intellectual would have probably helped him make some more intelligent choices, and if he was more articulate (at the least) it would have made the stupid **** he sometimes says sound a bit more "High-Society"... I'm still Independant though... party lines (for me at least) only foster radicalism and a separation... its so catch 22 anyway... sorry... rambling...
2007-05-07 05:06:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Alex G 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would HAVE been more likely to support him. Now that his actions have played out, it's too late. He's just been caught in too many ridiculous lies for me to trust him anymore. On the other hand, if he were an intellectual, he probably would have known better than to get himself bogged down in such bizarre nonsense.
2007-05-07 05:06:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Beardog 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whattar u talkin about? I'm very satiriffified with Dubya's commandment of the English language. But what really matters is that he's hard at work, workin hard, pertecting us from terrorists and evil doers, who want nothin more than to obtainify nucular weapons of mass destructivityness. That's right. Workin hard. Dubya out.
2007-05-07 05:04:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wouldn't matter. He's not a true Republican. He's a fiscal wreck, even without this war, his policies will end up costing us. His administration has acted like they are in the Communist party, acting out their "if you are not a party member, then you to be watched or arrested" policies. I find everything about him and his administration despicable. When he leaves office, the next guy is going to have to do more than steam clean the rug in the oval office to get the stench out.
2007-05-07 05:15:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dancing Bee 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
whether ur an intellectual or not, it's hard not to mangle a sentence when ur avoiding the truth. perhaps he would have fooled a lot more people, though.
2007-05-07 05:23:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by j.c. 3
·
1⤊
0⤋