The amount of money a person has does not determine how "rich" they are. My definition of "rich" is a bit different than the normal association of people and their money.
2007-05-07 04:20:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would consider myself rich if i had extra $$$ to spend on fun things
between savings for big ticket break downs ie roof,washer,car repairs etc......
and savings for college and old age
oh and the smallest one for a vacation this summer
there is nothing left to just go to the movies or eat out alot
let alone a shopping day other than groc.
so if i had just lets say 100.00 extra a week woohoooo NOW I WOULD BE RICH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-05-07 11:03:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by elite_women_rule_the_rock 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think You should be a president or a thief to be very rich in a year.
2007-05-07 11:05:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Yomy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess it would be more than a million, cuz I don't think a million would go far these days!
2007-05-07 11:02:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
100K+ Maybe not rich, but well enough off.
2007-05-07 11:03:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
£1.5 million sterling plus
2007-05-07 10:59:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by ♠ Merlin ♠ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dunno, darlin. Cathusband and Cat got about $30,000 last year and thought we were doing great - we could afford everything we needed, including gas for the cars! woooohoooo!
2007-05-08 22:09:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Baby'sMom 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
100k
2007-05-07 14:11:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
$50,000 a year
2007-05-07 14:12:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by ken s 6
·
0⤊
1⤋