English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

They are just striking out because their beloved socialist superpower, France, has just sent socialism a message, NO THANKS.......

2007-05-07 02:47:38 · answer #1 · answered by Armed Civilian 4 · 7 4

that is united statesa.. no one needs to be "allowed to criticize" somebody. I easily have under no circumstances seen somebody now not allowed to criticize the president-decide on. have you ever? You look slightly paranoid. Your attack on the "usually used Liberal (sic) reaction" is a susceptible one. valuable, Obama has made some statements approximately what he will do as quickly as fairly than activity (close Gitmo, case in point) and he's chosen his cabinet. flow forward and bash him for those concerns ought to you like. You sure at the instant are not finding for everyone's permission fo that, do you? yet to be sensible, shouldn't we wait to look what the guy essentially DOES in place of work before hammering him for doing what you additionally can evaluate he could do? Is that the "wide-unfold Liberal (sic) reaction?" No, it is now not. that's the only sensible reaction. once you have have been given a topic with that that is a "you subject." It has not something to do with Obama, liberals or conservatives. It has to do with the real as against the imaginary.

2016-10-15 00:06:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Conservatives know as much about France as they do Iraq, which is nothing.

The only good news for conservatives is that Bush may now only be the the 2nd stupidest world leader. After all, anyone who wants to be Bush's friend must be touched, themselves.

2007-05-07 02:55:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

rotfl
I think it's kinda cute to see a neocon get all mushy over France.
Too bad they didn't take a better interest in finding out about what a conservative is over there. They are making fools of themselves thinking that they are neocons.
A conservative over their is what you call a liberal over here. But then again you call anyone that doesn't agree with you a liberal.
tehehehehe

2007-05-07 02:59:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Because there's something in the liberal mind that prevents them from ever being happy. They always have to be pissed at something or it's like they don't count.

Maybe being mad is how they get their endorphins or something.

2007-05-07 11:06:23 · answer #5 · answered by Gonzo Rationalism 5 · 1 0

The only reason, especially you for instance, you cons are talking about it is because you think we care. If you didn't you wouldn't be talking about it. We don't care, we don't live there. Find another topic, how about the Board of Education scandal where everyone was taking handouts and bribes.. oh wait you wouldn't want that one, they were all republicans. Ok try the one about, no wait that was republican also. Ok just keep talking about this and I will ignore you until you find something interesting that actually effects me.

2007-05-07 02:54:30 · answer #6 · answered by bs b 4 · 3 3

I was wondering why the sudden interest. I noticed no questions prior to the election. The election of Sarkozy must be a Republican talking point that you guys are supposed to ask about. It's not a big item in the US media.

2007-05-07 02:50:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 5

Of course not. Sarkozy wishes for better free trade agreements, a stonger EU, and better immigration controls pouring millions into Europe from Africa. He is a conservative, but, not a neocon, more, a Gerald Ford, moderate and sensible conservatism.

2007-05-07 02:47:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 4

No, just the lack of understanding being fed to them through their trusted news source.

A year-long study by the University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes reported that Americans who relied on the Fox News Channel for their coverage of the Iraq war were the most likely to believe misinformation about the war, whatever their political affiliation may be. Those mistaken facts, the study found, increased viewers' support for the war. I figure the same goes for other things people learn through that news channel.

2007-05-07 02:50:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 7

Not criticizing. (With a "z," not an "s," by the way.) One would simply assume that since you guys have spent years talking about what a non-entity France is, you wouldn't be investing so much emotion in its elections, that's all.

Just another example of GOP hypocrisy.

I couldn't care less about France; I was barely aware it was having elections. You guys, on the other hand, were apparently glued to your little television sets.

2007-05-07 02:48:06 · answer #10 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 7 6

Oooo, Connie's losing her cool... LOL

2007-05-07 08:07:46 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers