In baseball, why do they call the third game of a three game set when its tied 1-1 the rubber match?

Answer 1

Deciding game in a series -- the term is largely taken from the card game bridge, but the origination of the term is uncertain. It's been around a while.

Answer 2

B. in case you witness a landslide while your group is getting clobbered, you're saying, "ok, it somewhat is in basic terms a million loss, each and all of the video games you play and submit to in suggestions it somewhat is in basic terms a million loss; there is often the following day." yet while your group loses by a million run, it breaks your heart. Like I witnessed the Giants, Rockies game a week or 2 in the past, the place the Rockies gained on a Walkoff Grand Slam. i grew to become into so mad that the Giants lost. we ought to continuously have gained that game having a three run lead and the bullpen coughed the game up. only staring on the whole game, paying interest to each 2d of the game and seeing your group lose the game is extra heartbreaking than only while your group gets embarrassed. it somewhat is annoying to look after once you recognize the place you need to have gained the game than taking an embarresing loss, only my opinion.

Answer 3

It probably derives from the set of French word for repetition, ie play again to decide the winner

French was the language of English nobility and the term probably gained its use in their tennis matches -- I think there are other French terms used in tennis as well, eg "love" for zero