Samurai warriors were noble, honorable fighters, with a skill umatched with the blade. The dynasty warriors were masters of war, and were fantastic in combat. By dynasty warriors im assuming you mean the historical figures from the "romance of the 3 kingdoms era", as depicted in the game "dynasty warriors 1-6". The normal warriors of the dynasty officers were nothing special, they were less trained and were simply there to die, but the officers were another story, they fought with unmatched skill.
In my opinion the officers of the three kingdoms, and those featured in dynasty warriors were awesome, the conquered armies with amazing tactics, they knew no fear and they themselves fought with amazing skill and honour... They might not win one on one with a sammurai, (but one cannot be sure of that because they were said to be pretty amazing duellists also), BUT, in a war the dynasty officers were untouchable, "guan Yu" was said to kill over 50-100 men himself per battle, and "lu bu" the same.
You do know that these "dynasty warriors" were actually real men? (cao cao, liu bei, guan yu, zhang fei, lu bu etc etc) and they were not just made up for the game?.
In my opinion the dynasty officers were supreme and they would win over the samurai any day in my opinion, the samurai were fantastic swordsmen, but the dynasty officers were simply masters of war.
cool question!
EDIT - the people above misunderstood the question, and to the girl with the "history major", do you have ANY idea how wrong your answer was?, samurai were protectors, and this person is asking about the 3 kingdoms dynasty officers, who were every bit as skilled as the samurai. They were not protectors at all, they were warriors and tacticians.
2007-05-06 20:42:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Thor the Mighty 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dynasty Warriors Vs
2016-11-09 20:38:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by knipp 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely Dynasty Warriors. they have more warriors as compared to Samurai warriors. Besides, DW has the awesome Lu Bu! Sure, SW has Maeda Keiji and Honda Tadakatsu, but they arent as strong as Lu Bu, Guan Yu or Zhang Fei. They dont even have a famous horse, unlike Red Hare, which belonged to Lu Bu and later, Guan Yu. Sengoku-era warriors cant match up to the Warriors of the 3 Kingdoms!
"Of men, Lu Bu; of horses, Red Hare" -Sanguo Zhi-
2007-05-07 03:50:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sylas Grayson 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Samurai warriors will win
2007-05-06 20:30:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Ming warriors. Japanese samurai attempted to invade Korea and were twice defeated by the Ming/Joseon alliance in the Imjin War (1592--1598).
2016-03-18 23:03:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Such types of wars are out of date.If at all such a war happens winning depends on circumstances.Samurai is suited only when there are only few people involved.The attack by Samurai is by surprise and frightrening the enemy with sounds and acrobatics.Dynasty wars depend on large number of soldiers to fight and its success depends on experise in handling weapons(sword etc).These two systems cannot be compared.
2007-05-06 20:42:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by leowin1948 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Samurai Warriors i'd say, Samurai Jack is a proof of that (lol)
2007-05-06 21:48:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by STAR S 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Samurai warriors. They have got the grade.
2007-05-06 20:42:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Forward 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
samurai..they were more trained,faster and more knowlegeble..they were taught how to be a samurai since they were little,knew how to survive and how to be the best..the dynasty samurai came after the original samurai came out and most of them were elite who tried to protect..the original samurai had more skills which the dynasty samurai capitalized upon
2007-05-06 20:32:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by icycrissy27blue 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
The samurai. Have you ever seen how deadly the katana is? First, they chop your arms off. And then one blow goes to the middle of your body (through your waist and your spine) and that turns you into two pieces.
2007-05-06 20:36:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by LindK 2
·
0⤊
3⤋