2007-05-06 20:05:30 · 8 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
NO THOUGHT IS WITHOUT A GENERATIVE PRINCIPLE.
2007-05-06 20:12:13 · update #1
I think you're overthinking this.
2007-05-06 20:11:47 · answer #1 · answered by Alice K 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can't sort that out. I can remember when I was very little, I had a concept of how far it was to run around the block, although I could not have told you how far it was; my concept corresponded to my size, and I thought it was much farther than I do now. Also, had an idea how long it took, but couldn't tell time. Don't know what this says about rate, time and distance, which bothers me a lot....if time doesn't actually exist, but is a concept refined to measure change.
2007-05-07 03:28:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you not know that some thoughts are without merit. and are generated for the degenerative effects that can be displayed. Even if only in the minds of some......
Day dreaming, for example, may or may not hold a principal..... sometimes, those principals are not always good..... And some, are a waste of time..... as are there some that have no conclusive evidence of being worthy of being spoken outloud.....
Your sister,
Ginger
2007-05-07 03:11:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Consciousness is the principle organ for thought, the brain is the physical anchor.
2007-05-07 21:08:45 · answer #4 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better wording.
There doesn't need to be princples to thoughts. There should be, but not everyone is clear of what their principles are.
2007-05-07 04:03:43 · answer #5 · answered by clcalifornia 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that is an inaccurate assesment.
People often have thoughts that have no basis in reality or that are totally contrary to anything in their life experiance.
2007-05-07 03:12:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't believe I dropped my keys off without getting kitty litter.
2007-05-07 03:08:28 · answer #7 · answered by master of dojo 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are absolutely correct.
2007-05-07 03:11:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋