Well not neccessarily science, but it's complicated...
I do in fact agree with you, no 'god' had to be involved in the creation of the universe and our evolution.
About the science, I meant in the sense of how you use the word, you use it as if it were a person or an entity such as 'god', but if you are simply using it to describe science laws and theories which do explain (at least right now, since we are willing to change our views when presented with a better scientific explanation) how the universe came to be and us too, then I totally agree.
2007-05-06 19:45:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ray 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where did science come from in the first place? You know, the cells, the whole incredible "coincidence" that it all works so well, together? Wood, steel, air. No, I don't know where the force that created it all came from, and you know as well as I do, that no one here can explain that. But we all know from our inner beings that there is a master plan. Anyone who has a scientific mind will eventually agree to that. Scientists who made a specific effort to explain away the creation of matter and life with a "coincidence" theory like the big bang, or other theories, were unable to legitimately conclude that one of those theories could ultimately have been responsible for the magnitude of complexity that exists in only one simple cell. They concluded that the complexity of functioning within just that one cell would have mathematical implications beyond any number they could come up with and would scientifically and mathematically be unexplainable. I think to acknowledge that we are here, (and I am typing this) is to acknowledge some orchestrator of it all. You can conclude that you don't like the one who did all this, you are unhappy with the outcome, you don't think it is as beautiful as other people may proclaim, but if you look at science, then look a little deeper. It seems pretty self-explanatory. If you don't think so, look under the microscope, or out at the sky. It speaks for itself.
2007-05-10 13:00:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by PR 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scientists and religionists are cast from the same mold. Both are looking for the Master Designer of the universe and all its laws. The religionists think personal faith is proof enough whereas scientists look for proof in facts and confirmed observation. Religionists believe faith is proof, scientists and others believe facts gleaned from experiments should be the proof. When you think about it, both are traveling with the same goal in mind but each is traveling a different road. Einstein often referred to the Grand Designer as the "Great Old One." Science and God are the dual gods of men and in this awesome universe we are not alone.....ever, as long as we listen to the whispers of our soul......and that's where your question came from......John
2007-05-07 15:24:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joline 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I could hand you a small box and tell you that there is a tarantula spider inside of it. It would be your choice to believe me or not. Science would demand that you open the box and see for yourself. But you can't possibly see everything yourself and yet must select a set of your own beliefs. It is likely impossible to prove a negative. And so there is no practical end to the debate among men of good will.
2007-05-07 03:02:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kes 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, Im not like most christians that look at god as a physical being. but I see it as God is an energy force. light force. or life force, how ever youwant to look at it, we are all made of energy, and we all have our fields of awareness and we all put out a chemical influence on things around us. positive and negative, I see like God And the devil. good and bad,
great and weak. llight and dark. up and down. in all things there is an opposite. so with the laws of the universe also has the circle of life, forever turning, just lilke our own dna. god came from the void (dark) and god is light.. and with out light,, can we live? I think not. so god is our life
2007-05-07 02:47:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
In terms of our physical existence - evolution
In terms of our minds....that's more difficult. I for one have a hard time with the scientific notion that our minds are nothing more than a bunch of interacting neurons. But, at the same time, I'm an athiest, so I don't think God has anything to do with it either.
2007-05-07 02:46:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by hulidoshi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
God- but I believe in Science too. Complicated, eh?
2007-05-07 02:39:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ammy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the beginning there was a giant squirrel-dinosaur hybrid that shouted "Halleluiah PRAISE THE LORD!!!" and suddetly 10 giant octopussies appeared out of nowhere and a long war began. The squirrel fought for years to come until finally a winner was declared. It seemed the winner was a giant bear by the name of Steve.
Steve cried out and the echos bellowed in the shallow winds of the past.
Then humans were born and they have been tiddy fugging ever after.
The end.
2007-05-07 02:40:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by dadsfas f 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
I agree, as of right now, the explanation given by scientific studies and theories on how things came to be is easily the best explanation out there.
2007-05-07 02:58:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Robert M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science is a process for developing knowledge (the scientific process), not a 'thing' that creates us.
God and the scientific process are a part of the universe. It is not a case of 'one or the other'.
2007-05-07 02:44:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Doctor J 7
·
0⤊
1⤋