English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

yes completely because they affect our daily lives so much, so therefore a factor in my voting would be who addresses that problem.

2007-05-06 14:46:01 · answer #1 · answered by michiganfan 3 · 0 0

No the problem with our gas prices has to do with many past presidents including Bush for not doing something about oil companies not being allowed to build more refineries. There hasn't been a new one built since the 70's. So how can we expect them to keep up with an ever growing population? And on top of that they have allowed environmentalists to add more and more restrictions and "blends" for different states. Say California ran out of gas and Arizona had a surplus and was willing to share. Under the laws we have now Ca. couldn't take their gas because apparently something happens when you cross that invisible state line, Arizona gas wouldn't work in Ca. lol how ridiculous is that? We need more then just a president to change things with the oil comanies we need a congress with common sense. And that is about as possible as liberals saying Bush's tax cuts are a good thing and need to be extended. I wish I had a better answer but until we the voters wake up we are looking at 5-6 dollar a gallon gas in the next few years.

2007-05-06 14:18:26 · answer #2 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0 1

nicely, Julie H is thoroughly incorrect. She copied this quickly from an city legend e mail going around that is thoroughly untrue. How irresponsible. Obama has stated he could prefer to develop capital valuable factors tax for top earnings investors, which he's defined as making over $250K consistent with 365 days. Neither candidate could replace the guidelines for abode sales. the extra perfect question is: the place do you think of the U.S. would be in 4 years if the two candidate is elected? Obama is all approximately helping the middle earnings guy or woman. He needs to introduce social healthcare, carry the troops abode from Iraq, push not undemanding on renewable power, and concentration on the financial gadget because it pertains to the undesirable and center earnings voters. McCain has not stated how he will help me yet. he's concentrating his efforts on making extra war with Iraq and probably beginning one with Iran, whilst giving extra to the oil companies in the form of off-shore drilling, even nevertheless he admits that is going to do not something yet make us sense extra perfect. usually he's purely critized Obama, whilst his consultant called us "a rustic of whiners" for complaining purely as you have. i think of my existence would be extra perfect in 4 years below Obama, and worse below McCain.

2016-10-14 23:09:07 · answer #3 · answered by carolan 4 · 0 0

Yes I will only vote for a candidate who will repeal the federal gas tax

2007-05-06 14:09:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not really. I would vote Republican without this issue. Hopefully, they will get big enough majorities to pass bills to drill in ANWR & off shore & maybe even streamline the process for getting aproval to build refineries. These are the long term solution to high fuel prices.

2007-05-06 14:19:16 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 1

Not at all. This has no bearing on a presidential candidate. I f one says he would lower gas prices, then I would be skeptical. I will be voting republican.

2007-05-06 14:46:52 · answer #6 · answered by doctdon 7 · 0 0

Possible

2007-05-06 15:08:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Only the tip of the iceberg......oh wait, there won't be any more icebergs soon!

2007-05-06 14:15:48 · answer #8 · answered by shermynewstart 7 · 0 0

yea no one will waste money driving to the polls

2007-05-06 14:07:51 · answer #9 · answered by x1yofuzzy1x 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers