Is total lack of knowledge about this helping to perpetuate Bush's failed war in Iraq?
2007-05-06 13:44:13 · 18 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's very sad to watch them drown themselves in Bush's Kool-aid.
2007-05-06 13:46:59 · answer #1 · answered by Magpie 2 · 4⤊ 5⤋
It’s not just sad, it’s scary.
It’s not surprising that that many Americans initially believed that Iraq and 9/11 were connected. That belief was deliberately developed by the Bush administration’s constant association of the two. It worked. Polls in 2003 showed that 70% of Americans believed that Saddam was personally involved in 9/11.
What is surprising is that people continue to believe this. Even the Bush administration perpetrators have taken pains to try to disassociate themselves from the link between Iraq and 9/11. Maybe the continuing belief is due to stubbornness because some people have to delude themselves and somehow continue to justify the invasion of Iraq as warranted despite the evidence to the contrary.
2007-05-06 14:48:07 · answer #2 · answered by tribeca_belle 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Iraq the country became on the time on the helm of Saddam Hson. SO he triggered the warmth simply by fact he became acquaintances with Bin encumbered and the Saudi undesirable adult men... the underground ones. those human beings are used to lives as Bedouins . hardship is they proceed to go. Iraq , Iran , Afghanistan.... like the darn PKK all of them flow interior each and each united states in spite of a border. I easily have stated all alongside Iraq is all approximately area. Why we located the biggest embassy there. Now we are putting human beings interior the hot facility... that is a key ingredient for international kinfolk, if it has a super gamble, to unfold. yet extremists do not prefer any variations. they have fought long years to evade it. You ... you get a bad wrap. Professor Pbrain tagged me immediately. Now there's a drone. 9/11 I firmly have confidence became AL Queada, everywhere he lives & breeds from.
2016-10-14 23:08:21 · answer #3 · answered by carolan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
vegaswom; Locutus; Shiraz 3… – et al.
What are you talking about?
The 9/11 and pre-war intelligence reports of the REPUBLICAN Congress both concluded:
- no connection to 9/11
- no connection to any terrorist organizations
- no terrorists in Iraq
- no training camps
- Hussein did not hide Al-Zawhari, he tried to have him arrested
- Hussein hated Al-Qaeda before we did, and of course
- No WMDs
The consensus among America’s intelligence agencies is that the war in Iraq is creating terrorists and that our presence in Iraq is making the situation there (the one Bush created) worse.
A State Department report due next will report that terror attacks increased 29% last year and deaths from terror attacks increased 40% over the previous year.
2007-05-06 14:41:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is sad. It is a national tragedy that Americans are so easily mislead to believe lies about such important things when the truth is readily available to them. They prefer to listen to the Fox propaganda network and proven liars like Rush, Hannity, Bush, Cheney and Rove.
Thats funny Randy D. Look at all the posts on this page by those who still believe it to be true. Have any of you republican loyalists ever thought to use an internet search to confirm the things you hear from your lying leaders? Google it!
2007-05-06 14:12:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Your question is based on a false premise.
And speaking of knowledge, were you not aware of Saddam's dismal compliance with numerous UN resolutions? Because the UN doesn't have the gonads to enforce international laws does not mean the US doesn't.
You were aware, I'm sure, that is was America's official policy to oust Saddam from power during Clinton's last term. Needless to say, Clinton had other priorities.
It's time to put the "Bush lied" rhetoric to rest.
2007-05-06 13:55:45 · answer #6 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
who thinks Iraq was involved, the administration has denied it, repeatedly, I have seen you claim this a few times so how about some links with quotes to something other than a liberal blog to differentiate between your several questions that ask the same thing, might liven them up a bit. also, what do you have against Jewish people, and will you finally tell me.
2007-05-06 13:59:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
who ever said it was i have never heard anybody say that Iraq just broke 17 resolutions and that the only reason we need to attack
2007-05-06 14:36:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. It is sad to see people who don't want to admit that Iraq and Saddam aided and abetted the attacks of 9/11.
2007-05-06 13:48:48 · answer #9 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 3⤊ 7⤋
I guess it depends on what you call sad.
2007-05-06 13:53:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋