2007-05-06 09:36:01 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes it is, though we're aren't suppose to know. it was he who planned 9/11 as an impetus to the takeover and when he lost the election, he was so filled with rage that he didn't bother stopping the attack. in fact, i've heard that he sat at home watching the attack on the Today Show, laughing an evil laugh and kneading his hands as the towers fell.
what a truly evil man..... have you noticed that his eyebrows, since the attack, now frame his eyes in what is that infamous inverted 'v' shape? and his ears are starting to reach a point.... he has a red cast to his skin and at first, i thought it was due to alcoholism, but now, i'm seriously starting to reconsider.....
2007-05-06 09:56:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Only if we allowed him to disband the military and disarm the citizens. Guns are a great tool for keeping people off your property and out of your country.
The Japanese know invading America was futile. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.
2007-05-06 16:42:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. He would not have invaded Iraq the result of which was multiplying the number of terrorist threats that exist. He would not have declared war on terror so he would not have made becoming a terrorist an even more impressive goal for an angry Muslim to embrace martyrdom.
He would have engaged in diplomacy with all the nut-case regimes all along instead of threatening them into the desire for the proliferation of nuclear weapons. He would have led with humility instead of tyranny.
He would have engaged the whole world who, on 9/12, was completely on our side, into working with us to ferret out terror cells. He would have invaded Afghanistan, made sure the poppies didn't get planted to finance the terrorists. I think he would have used his head instead of the body parts many seem to admire Bush so much for.
2007-05-06 17:00:53 · answer #3 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think not.
Read the Constitution...First Amendment:
Amendment I: Freedom of religion, speech, and the press; rights of assembly and petition Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of RELIGION, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Do you really think any President is going to go against the very first Constitutional Amendment and establish a national religion?? Even if for some psychotic reason he did, he'd be impeached pretty much immediately...and things would eventually return to normal.
2007-05-06 16:49:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Sharia Law would rule throughout the Caliphate
2007-05-06 16:55:34 · answer #5 · answered by Son of George Bush 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Looking at the way Bush took the romantic walk with the Saudi Prince and trying to sell ports ports to Dubai, that Bush is more interested in making it an Islamic state.
2007-05-06 16:40:32 · answer #6 · answered by Roy 4 · 5⤊ 5⤋
No,we would have stopped them before they got off the east coast,killed them off, hung Gore as the traitor he is and horse whipped Pelousy ,Reid and company.
The Clintons and Kerrys would have taken up residency in Tehran,Iran.
2007-05-06 16:44:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Uh...really?
Did you build a time machine to go find this out?
2007-05-06 19:04:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.. but likely he would have followed Clinton's anti-terrorist policy of appeasement and ignoring the problem.. and we'd have had another 3 or 4 9/11s.
2007-05-06 16:39:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋
Would Gore have held hands with a funder of suicide bombers?
2007-05-06 16:50:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋