Just like why did Bush criticize Clinton's nation building effort in Bosnia, but supports nation building in Iraq...
2007-05-06 08:51:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Shortly after the hub-bub died down from 9-11, Bush publicly acknowledged that Osama binLaden was not a "priority" any longer. That's because the Bush administration never had any intention of capturing binLaden.
Immediately following the 9-11 attacks, prominent Saudi Arabian investors attending a meeting of the Carlyle Group in Washington, DC were flown out of the country in U.S. government jets, even though air traffic had been all but grounded. George H.W. Bush, James Baker, and other former Bush cabinet members (of Bush administration #41) had all joined the Carlyle Group, which quickly became one of America's largest government contractors. Investors in the Carlyle Group included a family by the name of binLaden who had put up $2.5 million.
Osama binLaden, though ostracized from his family, would still be protected by the Bush administration. I believe it's a real possibility that binLaden was flown back into the country on those same government planes. Perhaps he was dressed in a 3-pc. suit and had shaved his beard and removed his turban. Then he was whisked away in a big black limousine with tinted windows to his family's huge gated (and guarded) compound just outside Orlando, Florida, where he still lives until this very day. Clinton didn't get Osama; Bush doesn't want to. And, for good reason: Osama binLaden had little, if anything, to do with the 9-11 tragedy. The Bush administration used that as a decoy to raise emotions and win unquestioned power to unconstitutionally and illegally invade Iraq. -RKO- 05/6/07
2007-05-06 09:02:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oil expenses a difficulty much less approximately terrorism from places different than Iraq and the concentration could be on green ability and international Warming. the different issues which could have been distinctive ought to be that if fairly of the invasion voters world huge have been to acquire the main outstanding to very own the planet . This to be carried out to grant human beings what they very own already. Then a precise to steer away from taking materials by armed tension. the different as universal the main outstanding to an unpolluted environment, and to guard such an environment. this might have made experience to do to steer away from The Iraq conflict or maybe The chilly conflict some years earlier.
2016-10-30 12:11:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by griglik 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bin Laden fought the russians in afghanistan.The cia didn't train him,he was given logistics and weapons.The"righties"complain because cliton had Bin Laden in custody several times through syria and refused to expedite him to the u.s......Those training camps were allowed to flourish under cliton without impedence.Bush is continuously killing or capturing the hierarchy of al qaeda.Is that enough logic for you?
2007-05-06 09:00:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by killa d 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
We are looking for Osama just not in Iraq, that is for a completely different purpose.
2007-05-06 10:03:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by rosslambert 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
How can having 23,000 American soldiers in Afghanistan,
Be considered ignoring Osama ?
Not to mention the 30,000 NATO soldiers in Afghanistan.
2007-05-06 10:25:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by jeeper_peeper321 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, if Georgie can just hang on another year or so, he can blame the whole thing on Clinton and Pelosi.
2007-05-06 10:44:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why do they blame Clinton for anything. He is not in charge anymore. End of story.
2007-05-06 10:53:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Liberalism is a mental disorder. Dr. Savage is correct. Just because the name is not mentioned does not mean that we are not trying to find this guy out there. Wake up!
2007-05-06 08:53:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by cadaholic 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Lefties should try to use a little bit of facts. This administration is not ignoring bin Laden.
2007-05-06 08:53:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by WinOne4TheGipper 3
·
1⤊
3⤋