No. Gore might have been a good or a bad president. But at least he wouldn't have lied to get us into a war or sacrificed thousands of American soldiers so some political budies like Haliburton could raid the American treasury.
2007-05-06 08:08:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Many critics argue that Democrats in general would not have had any reason to invade Iraq. While we as a country were told that WMDs (weapons of mass destruction) were present in Iraq, now much later we find out that the places supplying the intelligence, was just a pre-established bureaucracy to confirm pre-conceived Bush notions.
I think Al Gore would have done the same as Clinton when dealing with Iraq: drop bombs over Baghdad.
2007-05-06 08:11:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
probable not. If invoice Clinton could not destroy out with the question of no count if or not 0.33 base counts as an extra-marital affair, then i'm fantastically valuable they had attempt to rake Al Gore over the coals for what you purely requested. there's a capture nevertheless. That probable does not have happened nevertheless simply by fact Gore could have listened. that's the biggest subject with GW. He does not hear. the guy is so dense and bull-headed that is unreal.
2016-10-14 22:26:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by carrs 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would not have mattered what his intentions would have been. Republicans were still in control of Congress. They would have figured out a way to go around him (if he opposed invasion) to declare war which, before presidential authorization, would have been their power to do so.
However, if Gore did invade Iraq, many of these same GOP members would have worked against him like they did with Clinton in the Bosnian conflict.
2007-05-06 08:12:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If President Gore had been allowed to serve, I think that is a tragedy that would have been otherwise.
2007-05-06 08:44:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
That eunuch wouldn't have the testicles to invade a squad of high school cheerleaders.
9/11 would have been a terrible accident and coincident. The nuking of Los Angles would have been friendly fire and by now all schools would be teaching in Muslim. And yes, Muslim is a language, at least according to Senator Kerry who said "we need more soldiers that speak Muslim".
That man scares me more than an Iran with nuclear weapons.
2007-05-06 08:15:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by gimpalomg 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
absolutely not... lets try to remember here that Iraq was a humbled little country with a beaten CIA installed dictator.. no medicine, no infrastructure, ragtag military... now 3 years later Saddam is gone and we've stirred a bees nest and turned it into a flash point to cover our fuhrers Oily foot prints...
We shouldn't have gone and there is no amount of fear speak that can justify what "WE" let happen ....it's a sin by us all
2007-05-06 08:08:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
If Al Gore was President, the Taliban would still be running Afghanistan. He would have said 9-11 was due to global warming or some crap like that and then gone back to inventing things like the internet.
2007-05-06 08:03:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
5⤋
Dude... The only thing Gore invades is a big mac with double cheese.
2007-05-06 08:12:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Most likely not. If you followed politics at all you could have known this is on his agenda since he announced his run prior to the turn of the century.
2007-05-06 08:07:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋