are the members of modern talking gay?

Answer 1

No.
Thomas Anders is married to Claudia Hess, has a boy Alexander Mick.
Dieter had two wives, Erika and
Verona Feldbusch, three kids Marc, Marvin Benjamin, Marielin.
At the moment Dieter (53) has a 26 year old girlfriend, Estefania Küster.

Answer 2

First off, I am an Devout Catholic Second off, I am also a AP Psychology student From a religious point of view i do not accept homosexuality. I believe a man should lay with only a woman. From a personal view i am for gay marriage. I am very pro gay rights. From a SocioPsychological view I understand that being homosexual is not a matter of choice, that they can't help it. It has to do with the chemicals in their brain. They cant help being gay anymore than me or you can help being straight. So in my opinion, you shouldnt talk to her about it. As you cant change her brain chemicals. There is no way you can change her from being gay.

Answer 3

For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/avXMI

I think you are wrong that the modern interpretations of the Bible call homosexuality a sin, but more on that later. Here is what Jesus had to say: When the Sadducees asked him, what is the greatest commandment he replied: Matthew 22:37-40 (New International Version, ©2010) 37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[a] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” All the Law, think about that. The Christian life is no more complex than that. Love God, Love your neighbors, don't do anything to harm them. Loving another girl doesn't harm the neighbors or you or your cousin. There are also a number of Christian Churches like the United Church of Christ that are open and affirming and the Episcopal church that have gay members. Are you going to tell them their theology is wrong on yours is right? As to the Bible, an historical-critical approach reads the Bible in its original historical and cultural context. This approach takes the Bible to mean, as best as can be determined, what it's human authors intended to say in their own time and in their own way. Understood on its own terms, the Bible was not addressing our current questions about sexual ethics. The Bible does not condemn gay sex as we understand it today. The sin of Sodom was inhospitably, not homosexuality. Jude condemns sex with angels, not sex between two men. Not a single Bible text clearly refers to lesbian sex. And from the Bible's positive teaching about heterosexuality, there follows no valid conclusion whatsoever about homosexuality. Only five texts surely refer to male-male sex, Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, Romans 1:27 and I Corinthians 6:9 and I Timothy 1:10. All these texts are concerned with something other then homo-genital activity itself, and these five texts boil down to only three different issues. First, Leviticus forbids homo-genitality as a betrayal of Jewish identity, for supposedly male-male sex was a Canaanite practice. The Leviticus concern about male-male sex is impurity, an offense against the Jewish religion, not a violation of the inherent nature of sex. Second, the Letter to the Romans presupposes the teaching of the Jewish Law in Leviticus and Romans mentions male-mae sex as an instance of impurity. HOWEVER, Romans mentions it PRECISELY to make the point that purity issues have NO importance in Christ. Finally, in the obscure term 'arsenokoitai' ( a Greek word in the Bible), I Corinthians and I Timothy condemn abuses associated with homo-genital activity in the First Century, exploitation and lust. So the Bible takes NO DIRECT stand on the morality of homo-genital acts as such nor on the morality of gay and lesbian relationships. Indeed, the Bible's longest treatment of the matter in Romans, suggests that in themselves homo-genital acts have no ethical significance whatsoever. However, understood in their historical context, the teaching of I Corinthians and I Timothy, makes this clear: abusive forms of male-male sex - and of male-female sex - must be avoided. While the Bible makes no blanket condemnation of homo-genital acts and even less of homosexuality, this does not mean that for lesbians and gay men that anything goes? If they rely on the Bible for guidance and inspiration, lesbians and gay men will certainly feel bound by the core of the moral teachings of the Judeo-Christian tradition: be prayerful, reverence God, respect others be loving and kind, be forgiving and merciful, be honest and be just. Work for harmony and peace. Stand up for truth. Give of yourself for all that is good and avoid all that you know to be evil. To do that is to follow God's way To do that is to love God with your whole heart and soul. To do that is to be a true disciple of Jesus. Living by the Bible, gay and lesbian people will submit to those severe moral requirements - and those requirements apply also to sex and to intimate relationships. That is all that can honestly be said biblical teaching on homosexuality. If people would still seek to know outright if gay or lesbian sex is in itself good or evil, if homo-genital acts per se are right or wrong, they will have to look somewhere else for an answer. For the fact of the matter is simple enough. The Bible NEVER addresses that question. More then that, the Bible seems deliberately unconcerned about it.

Answer 4

No

Answer 5

No

Answer 6

eh?....