Do u think deciding matches on penalties is an unfair way to decide the winner?

Answer 1

i had a read about settling a football match recently...

let me say i never liked pks as i think it's not a fair way to settle the game...

the golden goal can be cruel, and i don't it's also fair...

to me i am inclined with the silver goal...

Answer 2

It is reasonable to use penalties to decide the winner of a match, and this is why:
-The first thing you have to think about is the players. If a match was not to be decided by penalties, then the only other reasonable way would be to extend the match. Players would not be able to handle that kind of strain. Referees would not. Hell, even the commentators would get tired after a while. Simply put, penalties mean a quick end to a long game.
-If neither team has scored, or if there has been a tie for a long time, the teams have lost the /priviledge/ to continue playing normally. If you can't break the tie, then you have to go through penalties.
-Penalties also provides a guide for players when they are practicing. Basically, penalties are a test of goal-scoring skills. Because of penalties, even players who usually would not score must practice getting the ball into the net from a certain distance.
-Penalties make good goalkeepers even more important!
The strongest case for penalties would be the fact that the players cannot possibly go on playing forever. Besides, who gets to decide when they should stop? In what time increments would the game continue, if penalties were disposed of? What if the game was to extend into the next day? It simply is unreasonable and unfair to tell the audience "sorry, come back tomorrow and /maybe/ we'll have a winner." What if there's still a tie tomorrow?
The penalty system is much less exhilarating, but much more reasonable.

Answer 3

As long as both teams are playing under the same rules, i.e., they both have 5 penalty kicks and can only choose from players on the pitch at the end of regulation or overtime, then it's fair. Some people think its unfair because their team lost but if their team won, I don't think they will complain.

Is there a better way to do it? Maybe. Add more overtime? Sudden death? First team to score wins? Toss coin - heads or tails? It's up to FIFA to decide if there's a better way to do it.

Answer 4

Sure Unfair bcoz:
- The home team have the Fans.
- Some teams dont play and try to keep the match till pen. which will make the match bad.

I think they can make a software connected to many cameras which after the match time calculate which team plays better.
The problem is HACKING :)

Answer 5

in some way it is unfair, but let's be honest, i dont think any player can handle more than 2 hours of running around after the ball! :))

penalties is just a way that shows "enough, the match has to end with a winner" :)

Answer 6

Well my dearest Chelsea fan, I think it's a fair way but I don't either--get me? Penalties don't really prove anything. Actually, the only things they prove is how slick a goalkeeper is and how tired players become after a match. I was disappointed in Chelsea for having failed to reach the final but what the heck... Chelsea is Chelsea and their fan I will stay!

Answer 7

If chelsea won, you would not ask this question. How unfair is it? Every game has rules and rules maintain the beauty of the game. Besides, by the time penalties are played, everyone is tired. so fair game.

Answer 8

Yes, as the teams does not get to play the game as the referee sometimes calls the game by himself and does not let the players play to see who is better. But of course penalties should be there as they serve as order in the game. The referees just have to use them wisely.

Answer 9

i will merely communicate for American soccer, whether it relatively is in all probability an identical ingredient as in soccer. Too many outcomes in American soccer will unavoidably lose you field place and take extra time without work of the clock and there fore what replaced into at one time a scoring force will become a huge fat fail. i will merely anticipate that for the time of soccer a penalty that ends up in an undefended kick could actually be a ingredient in prevailing. much less/no outcomes and you have a extra useful probability.

Answer 10

every team who win a soccer much in a penalty is a **** team Brazil wan 2 times in a Penalty against Italy England in 1966 wan a penalty Argentina wan in a penalty Italy never wan anything on penalty we like to score goals but the referee even do not give in the final 2006 we score 2 good goals but the referee he did not give one he gave a penalty to France which wasn't a penalty.But one old verb says do not cheat if you do not like to be cheated so they liked to go on penalty and god ****** them up.