Then why is it he is forcing their hand in the Iraq funding bill?
If they don't send him a bill he wants it gets vetoed, showing that libs just don't want to try and work WITH the president as they said they would do.
So now it will come to this. Either NO bill that congress sends to Bush will get passed OR the dems will be forced to defund the war up front and in the open, ultimately showing the country just how "cut and run" they really are.
Makes Bush pretty smart if you ask me.
2007-05-06 02:22:45 · 9 answers · asked by scottdman2003 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Liberals don't have a clue.They want everything to be easy and free.They feel they're smart,superior for wanting to negotiate and trying to understand our enemies.Blame America first is always been the number one rule of the far left.There's a reason Stalin called the liberals useful idiots.I disagree,there's nothing useful about them.They are a threat to America and need to be exposed and stopped.
2007-05-06 02:32:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
The poor little guy is going to have to compromise on something rather than have a blank check. I think the dems are pretty smart because they are making him do the rest of what is necessary to win this conflict or get the hell out.
General Patreas said this conflict can not be won militarily. It requires diplomacy with the neighboring countries and measures within the Iraq government along with the surge to complete the desired results. He can do it all so there will be some hope or forget it.
2007-05-06 02:38:16 · answer #2 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If Bush is so stupid how did he,
1) orchestrate the 9-11 attack, as the moonbats suggest? Seems to me like it would take a certified genius to devise something so huge and sinister.
2) graduate from Yale with the same GPA as Kerry?
3) get elected governor of Texas?
4) win the Presidency twice?
5) get most of his bills passed?
6) manage to marry such a lovely woman and have two such well-spoken, well-adjusted, intelligent daughters?
2007-05-06 02:56:44 · answer #3 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not stupid, greedy and self serving.
Troop support does not mean money alone. How do you think the troops feel when the president extends their tour of duty and cuts their combat pay? Hires mercenaries that make many times over what a US soldier makes. This is support??
If Bush and his followers want to support the troops, re-instate the draft and help them get more boots on the ground so they can finish what has been started.
Plus, the military has enough funding to carry on operations in Iraq until July. The bill for funding at this point is just political pissing contest material.
2007-05-06 02:30:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
the democrats have never wanted to work with Bush in any way shape or form. before they had the house majority, they never got bills through that he objected to. now that they have the majority I believe that every bill that gets through will have something about a time line to leave Iraq and every bill will be vetoed. so its a basic lame duck government. no one will give in.
2007-05-06 02:36:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We did, we outvoted him interior the 1st election. regrettably, his 2d term grew to become into sealed while he started a "conflict" in his first. No President has ever did no longer shelter a 2d term for the time of wartime, and this grew to become into no exception. it somewhat is not any longer via fact we concept he grew to become into only and doing the main outstanding element, it grew to become into via fact too many different people who have been against his movements desperate to vote for him via fact they concept he surely had a plan that could get tousled if somebody else took place of work. specific, we mutually screwed ourselves, yet no longer with out a combat! you notice, the difficulty with democracy is which you get the kind of government you deserve. If the final public of the folk are blithering idiots, the guy that gets the main idiots to rally to his edge get's to instruction manual all and sundry else, inspite of whether or no longer he's a blithering fool himself.
2016-10-30 11:45:01 · answer #6 · answered by gartman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He isn't regarded as smart by the leaders in the ME who are turning against him and our troops.
2007-05-06 02:29:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's not a matter of think, it's a matter of knowing he's stupid!
2007-05-06 02:27:48 · answer #8 · answered by chatticathi52 4 · 2⤊ 7⤋
No, it makes him a jackass.
2007-05-06 02:30:27 · answer #9 · answered by zipboing 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋