English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Their goal is to eliminate a society based on the individual.

2007-05-06 00:48:27 · answer #1 · answered by c1523456 6 · 4 1

Have you taken into account that so many mistakes have been made in this conflict that we now have our military on their 3rd and 4th tour? Where are the replacements? How long does it take to train our new recruits? Have you taken into account that there are more terrorists now than there were before the Iraq conflict and their numbers are growing? Where are we going to get the money to continue the Iraq conflict? Trees? What will happen when the U.S. goes broke? I never hear that mentioned. Amazing. We won't even be able to protect ourselves here when that happens.

Just how long do you really think we can stay there? I absolutely do not think there should be a withdrawal date that is publicly known but I think there should be some indicator that would permit a withdrawal. Not something vague. Look up the definition of surrender.

2007-05-06 00:31:22 · answer #2 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 0 2

At this point in time we haven't gained a whole lot by fighting with terrorists either have we? Whatever King George the First and Prince Cheney the Dick have gotten us into is simply not working either. Can you honestly say we are accomplishing anything? So far this "war against terror" has gotten tens of thousands of people, both Americans and others, killed. Cost billions of dollars. And has made my...repeat..MY country hated all over the world. You right wingers seem to forget that you are not the only Americans that have a right to call the United States MY country. It isn't working...it's time to try something else.

2007-05-06 00:40:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I have not heard one single person say "Come on over Bin Laden, you can stay at my house!" Because that's just stupid. Nobody wants to surrender to anyone. Are you so much of a jingoist that NOT having a war is automatically a surrender? In that case why aren't you at war with every other country on earth?

2007-05-06 00:47:58 · answer #4 · answered by Mordent 7 · 1 0

i think of for the main section a lot of people, no longer in straight forward terms Liberals, are needing a withdrawal because of fact they do no longer understand the complexity of the priority. they think of that if we go away the section that the extremists could be chuffed. The terrorists in basic terms isn't chuffed because of fact there are various stuff they think of are evil or undesirable of their each and on a daily basis lives they blame the western international for. Western help for Israel being a substantial ingredient in this. Going returned to isolation via no longer attempting to confront the terrorists like called for via many is a undesirable theory. of course it did no longer artwork for the time of WWII (Japan delivered us into the conflict) because it did no longer artwork recently (over 20 substantial terrorist assaults culminating interior the commerce towers).

2016-12-28 14:55:39 · answer #5 · answered by Erika 3 · 0 0

u know the liberals will gain and save the lives of many innocent iraqi ppl and apply the worn-out slogan(world peace) by the surrender of the American "terrorists" and their retreat from there,
this will happen with or without the liberals and let the bush party burn with defeat!!! the inevitable end!!!of the real terrorists whose violence breeds more violence

2007-05-06 00:28:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

They want all of the blame to rest, squarely on the shoulders of Our President. They do the dirty deed. But give him the blame. And the media soaks it up. Which makes a generous amount of Mind-numbed Americans, believe it.

2007-05-06 00:26:02 · answer #7 · answered by Nunya Bidniss 7 · 1 0

A return to the status quo ante - where Iraqis can determine their own fate, the US can defend its own shores, and young Muslims men can calm down because we are not antagonizing them by occupying their countries and holy lands with US troops.

2007-05-06 00:14:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

I suppose that you're going to be here all day, asking virtually the same question over and over again? Have fun with that.

2007-05-06 00:14:08 · answer #9 · answered by dmanley 2 · 2 2

there were no terrorist in Iraq,until bush overthrew the government there,aL quaida moved in after wards

2007-05-06 01:56:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers