gun rights?

Question

i have asked this before but did not get any simple answers. why cant a non violent felons wife have guns in their home? she is not a felon. so that seems like her rights are being violated? i would like to have solid proof of this question, not opinions. ty kindly

Answer 1

The problem isn't with the wife. After someone has been convicted of a felony, they are no longer allowed to own, purchase or possess any firearm. If your husband and you live in the same house and he has this restriction, since you would have the gun in his residence, it cannot be allowed.

Answer 2

a million. Ever think of that for this reason human beings flow to taking photos levels and aim prepare? i don't be conscious of of everyone that has a gun and hasn't had some form of coaching. 2. You mean an identical below the impact of alcohol that somewhat recalls his own call? If somebody is below the impact of alcohol sufficient to get right into a bar combat, then probability is he is going to be too below the impact of alcohol to keep in mind he has a gun, pull it out and fireplace it before everyone realizes what's happening and/or protection overpowers him. additionally, many bars do not enable weapons on the premises consequently. So this argument is fallacious from the beginning up. Violent persons are going to be violent with or and not utilising a weapon. those human beings many times 3. As became already stated: a gadget gun isn't comparable to an attack rifle. And the belief at the back of it is that there should not be a gun that the government has that a qualified civilian shouldn't even have get right of entry to to. i'm not asserting I do or do not consider this, yet I comprehend why persons are for them. 4. WRG hit the nail on the pinnacle. The shape became written over 220 years in the past. there is a lot on the subject of the country immediately that may not comparable to that ingredient. It is mindless to maintain changing the wording on a record including that each and each single time a sparkling invention consists of mild. It additionally say does not easily say that we are able to have an Air stress simply by fact planes hadn't been invented yet. The Framers actual did not intend to avert using new technologies in the U.S. and the suitable court has, numerous circumstances, made it very sparkling that lots of the record is open to interpretation as our lifestyle and ideologies evolve.

Answer 3

More then likely they won't allow her to have the gun due to the fact that a convicted felon in living in the house and has access to the gun. The felon is not allowed to own or be around a gun so that takes her rights away to own it.

Answer 4

She has lost no right. As long as the type of guns are legal for the public(machine guns etc aren't), she can legally own the guns, and have them in her home. However, her felon husband HAS lost rights. She can have the guns. He CAN'T live in a home with guns. He WOULD have to move out. Just because she can't have both, doesn't mean she has lost rights.

Answer 5

Public good vs private rights - always a tricky area!
If she's got a gun, so has her husband.
In the law, and in the Bible, a Man and his wife are often considered one person, and for good reason. If I were a felon and my wife owned a gun, I think I would be able to use it.

Answer 6

My friend is a gun dealer. He said because you would have access to the guns. True, your wife is a non-felon, but you would be too close to firearms. That's the best he could explain it.

Answer 7

Guess she's got the right to choose what she want's most, the gun or the felon?

Answer 8

its his home also...felons are prohibited from haing a gun in contact with them...their home,business,or vehicle...if they live together,neither can haveone...being non-violent doesnt have anything to do with it...he should have stayed home that day

Answer 9

It is not a fundamental right to possess a fire arm and hence question of violation of rights does not arise. !!

Answer 10

Yes she can You can't. that is a fact.