2007-05-05 23:34:51 · 6 answers · asked by freepress 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Simply no because the decision was mad by Bush's Administration without authorized by UN Security Council. Don't forget that yes. There are many reasons but I'm going to mention only one; Bush's government has taken loans from Chines/world bank so it need to be payed off. The next Americana's President would be responsible to pay. However, they don't pay it from their own budget so poor taxpayer had to pay......Even IF Americana's succeeded in military intervention in Iraq so they must re-build, simply they cannot leave as its demolished....
2007-05-06 00:22:42 · answer #1 · answered by Jeorge-s 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not hardly, but we should assist them in their rebuild. Their oil revenues should be a big part of the rebuilding. We financed many of the rebuilding that went on in almost all countries after WW2. Do you question that as well. The price of leaders of the free world comes with a responsibility to help others in need.
2007-05-06 06:39:50 · answer #2 · answered by meathead 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe the viewers of FOX news should be. I would say anyone who voted TWICE for Bush, there ought to be a Bush-War tax for that very purpose. Its their war.
Let them pay for it.
2007-05-06 06:39:56 · answer #3 · answered by planksheer 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I see your confusion and pain on this subject. War is never a good thing. Yet when some are trying to kill us and force their will on us what do we do? Either lie down and take what they bring, or fight them and back them 100
2007-05-06 06:47:06 · answer #4 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, we never were. We're there to help and offer technical assistance, at least I think and hope that's what we're doing.
2007-05-06 06:38:21 · answer #5 · answered by luckford2004 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do hope so. It's your mess, you should clear it up.
2007-05-06 06:40:23 · answer #6 · answered by toowit2wu 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋