2007-05-05 20:00:03 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If they decide to, it's their decision.
Just like it was Clelsea Clinton's decision not to enlist.
And after all, Clinton used the military in:
Iraq
Serbia
Sudan
Kosavo
Afghanistan
Haiti
2007-05-05 20:32:39 · answer #1 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No. They can best be protected outside the war zone. You can be sure, their lives are on the line wherever they are. George Bush has dared to go after people who pride themselves on cruelty. President Bush and his family will be in peril the rest of their lives. I think the war is a mistake but I will not dismiss the great courage of our President and his family.
2007-05-13 16:54:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i love all the ignorant people in the world; listen, the daughters are NOT going to war, they might get killed! But it is fine for everyone else to give their kid's to get killed. I know I thought when my children were born, ( boy, i just can't wait for my kids get big enough to die for a man who doesn't know what he is doing), I am sure everybody thinks that when they have kids. And, if nothing else, i can put the kids in the back seat of a car and drive them into the lake to die! Pleeze!!! The world don't need ANY more kids period. One way or another alot of them are being bused. If i would have known before I had kids, there would have been no kids in my family. The world is getting to wierd. I am sick to death of it and can't wait for my Lord to call me home! Answer to the question! YES they should be sent to war so they have some idea they don't serve breakfast in a fox hole, well, not on silver platers anyway!
2007-05-13 11:39:16 · answer #3 · answered by cprucka 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Only if they want to; it is still a volunteer military, but I think your point is good: How would George W. Bush feel if it were his OWN children he was sending off to die for his pride and his family's oil interests.
Why the hell doesn't he get that? Oh, yeah, because he is an IDIOT!!!!!!
2007-05-13 18:27:43 · answer #4 · answered by Pamela B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush daughters have not selected military carrier. In Military service there is no exception. British Prince who is in Military service has to join his unit. It is a honor to service the country.
2007-05-13 07:08:05 · answer #5 · answered by snashraf 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
people who connect the army are many times human beings from undesirable economic backgrounds. they many times merely have a severe college graduation. wealthy human beings do no longer connect the army so as for this reason the Bush daughters are no longer combating in Iraq. it may ought to with the actuality that they do no longer choose to circulate.
2016-10-04 11:09:51 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be a security nightmare and cause more problems! Prince Harry was causing such a security problem that he probably won't go. By the way, no one should join unless that's what they want to do. That's what is so cool about our military,.
2007-05-13 13:39:53 · answer #7 · answered by TAT 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most people wouldn't wish the threat of death to someone else. Would YOU go to war if the Bush girls went?
2007-05-05 20:29:56 · answer #8 · answered by -M- 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
those two daughters of Bush they are just as corrupt as George W. Bush is they would refuse to put their life on the line for their country so would the mother.
2007-05-13 07:35:40 · answer #9 · answered by Coolbreeze 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If they want to join, why not, if they don't, why should they, its called a voluntary enlistment, I did it, and if there was a war, I would fight it, you got to get over this. Read some history, and stops listening to Nancy.
2007-05-12 18:01:50 · answer #10 · answered by Larry S 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
IF they volunteer like the soldiers who are there now.
That's not a very smart questions since conscripts haven't been in since 1972.
Where are you from?
2007-05-13 14:59:02 · answer #11 · answered by USA 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋