English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-05 17:36:29 · 11 answers · asked by Obsidian © 5 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

11 answers

actually they are complementary processes... they only go together

2007-05-05 17:40:58 · answer #1 · answered by ♫Pavic♫ 7 · 1 1

I think I learn & when I learn I think

2007-05-06 00:40:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Both. You have to learn to think, and then you think to learn.

2007-05-06 03:28:25 · answer #3 · answered by wolflady 6 · 1 0

I think to learn....but ive realized over time that, the things i learn make me think about new things...so maybe i do both...

2007-05-06 19:05:52 · answer #4 · answered by Jaded 7 · 1 0

I think to learn. =)

2007-05-06 00:39:23 · answer #5 · answered by Georgia Rose 7 · 1 0

I think to learn through abstract art

2007-05-06 00:39:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

learn to think XD

2007-05-06 00:39:24 · answer #7 · answered by ♥♪♫[K]ath² [BUTT '14 ツ]♫♪♥™ 6 · 1 0

Definitely think to learn.
The more I think I learn the more I see there is to know.

2007-05-06 03:15:36 · answer #8 · answered by Threeicys 6 · 1 0

Both

2007-05-06 00:43:57 · answer #9 · answered by Wendy 5 · 1 0

Both. They are complementary.

2007-05-06 00:53:32 · answer #10 · answered by Mikisew 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers