Not really, no. You'll only think that if you believe the propaganda you see on television.
2007-05-05 16:58:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by extton 5
·
6⤊
2⤋
Not really. Hollywood Party? Ronald Reagan, Arnold Schwartzenegger, Sonny Bono, Clint Eastwood, Fred Thompson, all Hollywood people who ran for office as Republicans (can you name one Democrat who ran for office who was an actor also?) , also Charlton Heston was President of the NRA. Homosexual? The Bush White House was visted by gay prostitute Jeff Gukert/Gannon over 100 times. Foley was a republican and not because his district was, what a lame excuse. Pro Choice? Well two out of three ain't bad
2007-05-06 00:43:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Me Thinks You Got Your Party's All Twisted Around there Sparky... To get real Knee Jerkin', Up Front, and Wide Open Action in Responses why dont ya Skip on down to William "Bottoms Up" Kristol's Oriffice. The Hole Gang wil be there for additionals Views on This Matter... Paul Wolfowitz, Phillip"The Prancer" Zelikow, Douglas"Duggie" Feith, Elliot"Ellie"Abrams, John"Big Boy"Bolton, Daniel "Knobby Knees" Perle...this Gala Event will Just be alll The Rage in D.C. And Rudy "The Savage" Giuliani will be the HighLight of The Ball, wearing His New Lacey Pink Potato sack.. Expect a Gay Ole' Time !! http://www.antichristconspiracy.com
2007-05-06 00:58:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
This seems to be the case, but the real scoop is that these are the groups who are making the most noise and getting all of the press.
I know several democrats and they couldn't care less about these far left moon bats - the Hollywood crybabies are the proverbial squeaky wheel, but the rest of the wagon is in good shape and rolling along just fine.
2007-05-06 00:06:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't think so. They have always been the peoples party, without bias, helping people out, not discriminating because sex, race, religion. or size of the bank account It's the stuff America was founded on. Seems we see more homosexuals coming out of the republican closet these days to make it a non-issue that repug's should be quiet over.
2007-05-06 00:42:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by andy r 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
It still is the party for working people. But it's also the party for tolerance and liberty. Much like Hollywood is, that's why a lot of people with those characteristics end up as entertainers.
2007-05-06 01:10:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
Yes, right after republicans - the party of toothless hicks, KKK, NRA and other white supremacists - elected the little monkey and exterminated "the working man" by imbecile tax policies.
2007-05-07 02:54:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No.
I disagree.
It has become the Pro-USA party.
Not selling out to Big Business, or foreign interests.
Can you say Dubai port deal 3 times fast.
I would rather hang out with "Hollywood, Homosexual, Pro-choice people",
than "TERRORIST SUPPORTING SAUDI PRINCES" any day.
But I love the USA, so I am not like you.
2007-05-07 01:22:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
First of all, the Dems do support the working man. How did the Repubs go from being the party of financial restraint to having the biggest deficit in history? From respect for privacy to interfering with people's person information? From advocating a small central government to maintaining the biggest bureaucracy in history?
Barry Goldwater must be spinning in his grave.
2007-05-06 00:00:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by notyou311 7
·
8⤊
2⤋
you have GOT to be kidding.
Hey I'm all for working persons and movies and gay civil unions and women's moral competency to make their own reproductive decisions. In seriousness, the Dems have always been for the rights of the underdog, be it a factory worker or a gay person. The rest is spin spin spin.
2007-05-06 00:13:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by ash 7
·
7⤊
1⤋
It's sad to think america has come to a point where people think it's okay to bash someone else's freedom wether it meets their spritual beliefs or not we used to be a country where you were free from religiuos persecution and free from having your beliefs persecuted.
2007-05-06 00:44:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by Amy m 6
·
2⤊
1⤋