What about the Bunny that works for Cadburry? I don't think your work here is done.
2007-05-05 13:57:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Hot Coco Puff 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
What about the Best Answers i got for answering this question????
"It does sound puzzling at first, but how much does one have to think until one realizes that both chicken and egg must necessarily have come from something that is neither a chicken nor an egg? This answer was knowable centuries before biology came about, yet people assumed there was some unsolvable mystery behind the issue.
The modern chicken is generally believed to be a descendant of "Archaeopteryx", the oldest known bird. This 150 million year old resident of the Jurassic period laid eggs, and at some point of time, evolved into an animal that was one generation away from being a proper chicken.
"The egg came first.
DNA mutations occur in the early stages of life of organisms. As you know, when new cells divide, the DNA within the nucleus separates nucleotides and duplicates, then two new helix are formed. The amino acids responsible for mitosis are prone to make mistakes to the genetic architecture-- a beautiful system of flaws that cause evolution and diversity in species. It's like the reason why children will look like their parents, but not approximately, they are a combination of both parent's ancestor genetic history and the result of new combinations in the DNA helix.
So according to fossil research, before the chicken was the "proto-chicken" and this bird was almost chicken, but not quite. Well this proto-chicken laid an egg with a mutation, and the interior change of the DNA was enough that the exterior of the new bird could be thought of as a new species.
The first chicken had to hatch from a chicken egg to qualify to be a chicken, so the egg came first."
2007-05-05 14:54:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all I would like to congratulate you on your fine achievement, as this question has been asked for a very long time. I almost can't believe that you won best answer for it.
However, what is "best" anyway?
Does "best" have anything whatsoever to do with absolute truth?
There is no "best." Everything is the best.
I don't fully understand this concept, but I believe it to be true.
2007-05-05 14:02:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the chicken egg category
2007-05-05 13:58:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by shea 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope. You got a best, now you have a reputation to maintain. All categories are fair game. Have fun.
2007-05-05 14:04:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by St N 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Indisputably. And as a recurring mystery in all categories I would say that you have satisfactorily covered all bases. Huzzah! lmao
2007-05-05 23:42:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, the stupid questions on here are endless. Someone with way to much free time needs to answer them
2007-05-05 14:05:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is work? If so, I am missing a few paychecks, I can tell you that much!
2007-05-05 14:04:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Satia 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're so vain you think this board is about you... Don't you?
2007-05-05 14:19:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋