If one had to choose between B Clinton and GW Bush as president, who would it be?

Question

and why?

Answer 1

the evul dictator jorge boosh

Answer 2

Bill Clinton.He actually understood international politics,is an amazing political talent who could even compromise work with a congress that was totally anti him.
He worked together nationally and internationally.He had integrity,honesty insight and knowledge in the way he lead America.He tried to think what his policies would do to common people as well as long established international allies
Comparing George W Bush as a president to Bill Clinton is much like comparing Vanilla Ice to Tupac.Bush is no match and not even a real challenge

Answer 3

Bill Clinton. He reduced the national debt, America's standing in the rest of the world was more favorable, and it was the greatest peace time economically that this country has ever seen. Ever since George Bush has been in office, the national debt is at higher levels than ever, Congress is at odds over everything, the budget has been thrown in the garbage, too many countries view us as the bully on the block, and the "leader" is thought to be the biggest idiot ever to run this country.

And for the Republicans that are going to bring up Clinton's adultery, look at Bush's previous personal behavior. He is an admitted "recovering" alcoholic, he is an accused ex-cocaine addict, he dodged the draft by coming up with some phony national gaurd tenure, and his seems to pick the most incompetent people for his cabinet, which makes him a bad judge of character.

Answer 4

Bush's lies are worse. U.S. suitable court Justice Robert Jackson, who served simply by fact the supervisor prosecutor of the biggest Nazi war criminals, called beginning a war without reason the "suitable war crime" simply by fact all different war crimes bypass from it. below the United international locations shape, that is a binding international treaty ratified by potential of the united states, it is illegitimate to attack yet another united states different than: a million) whilst authorized by potential of the protection Council; or 2) whilst needed for self-protection and then only for as long as had to get the subject to the protection Council. the protection Council unanimously exceeded determination 1441 that got here across Iraq in cloth breach of past resolutions and warned of "intense effects" if Iraq did not conform. yet that determination additionally explicitly stated that the protection Council remained seized of the subject and the united states certain the different contributors that determination 1441 did not authorize it to attack Iraq; the U.S. could ought to return to the protection Council for yet another determination before it could desire to attack Iraq. In early 2003, the united states did return to the protection Council with a determination authorizing an attack on Iraq. whilst it grew to grow to be sparkling that the proposed determination could desire to not muster a majority, the united states withdrew the determination and attacked Iraq besides. there is no crime extra intense than illegally beginning a war. i'm nonetheless baffled by potential of people who say Clinton's lie became below oath so it became worse. A lie is a lie, no count if it is below oath or not....

Answer 5

Both serve the same interests, we are under republicratic form of government, going into facism, geting closer to comunism the other way around, where the government owns the ways of production and services, but now with the exesive lobbing, the ways of production and services are owning the government.

Answer 6

Clinton! He fixed the FIRST deficit the Republicans created. Who will fix this one? Willy also created 22 MILLION high paying jobs with good benefits. His overseas diplomacy was nothing short of magnificent, and; he cared about the poor and sick among us; still does!! All Bush cares about is lining the pockets of his oil rich friends, and his daddy's friends, and their friends, oh and btw; The Saudi's, INCLUDING THE BIN-LADEN FAMILY!!!

Answer 7

im from texas and i thought that he made a better baseball owner than president. I thought that once he became president. He would use our military to have a 24hour security on our borders. meaning say every 20 feet would be a armed marine. That would have prevented 9-11.

Answer 8

That's a really ugly choice.

I would have to choose Clinton, as I did Kerry in '04, simply because Bush's incompetence is hurting our nation.

Of the 18 candidates I've heard speak so far the ones I like the best are Guiliani, Hunter, Paul and Richardson.

Answer 9

Bill Clinton EASILY.....He was one of the great Presidents and GW is one of the WORST EVER, imo. Clinton was a good communicator and tried/succeeded in expanding the US in financial arenas, diplomatically and fairly. GW has alienated the rest of the world and made the US the most hated it has EVER been.

Answer 10

I'd still pick Bush. Clinton got an easy pass and didn't have to deal with any problems, but he made plenty for others. If Clinton had done his job better, I don't think Bush would have had to face as much. Clinton just wanted to be some kind of rock star.

Answer 11

Bill Clinton. When he left office we had a surplus for the first time since the depression. With Bush we wind up with the highest deficit in history in record time. Furthermore, a man who gets a little on the side is a lot less dangerous than a man who starts wars.