which one?
2007-05-05 08:12:18 · 14 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
she had bunches of fake accents so would she be the southern the i want to be like a man the church going and watch illegally aliens kids while the older ones work or the one who kisses up to al sharpten and his group.
2007-05-05 08:22:14 · update #1
Comrade Clinton
2007-05-05 08:47:30 · answer #1 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The same one we see now. That would be someone who is not so arrogant and so stubborn that they are incapable of assessing a situation, seeing it has gone in the dumper, and changing their mind when it's warranted. We've already seen what the constipated mind that refuses to change can accomplish - just look at Iraq. We don't need another one like the one we have. Politicians who don't have the intelligence or common sense to change their mind when the evidence shows it is warranted are not only useless to America, but dangerous as well. We have a great example of how little that accomplishes in George Bush.
2007-05-05 15:21:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think we will experience the fictional, homosexual, Hillary that was promoted by radical conservative media and echoed by mass media. This is total fiction. Check with Al Franken.
I think that we will get the real Hillary, who has high conservative integrity. That's a bit unfortunate, because she will be promoting the same conservative program that got us into Iraq. She will be very good for multi-national interests since she, like nearly every political candidate, has been bought off by corporate interests.
2007-05-05 15:23:21 · answer #3 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton, I'm guessing.
I don't think Hillary Duff is running.
I hope that clears things up for you.
p.s. Is your last name Bush? You seem to have a bit of a problem with comprehension.
2007-05-05 15:16:01 · answer #4 · answered by frugernity 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hilary Duff :p
2007-05-05 15:17:14 · answer #5 · answered by Slovenijan Wolf 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
she won't, despite our claims of being a progressive nation and leaders of the free world , we've been extremely sterotypical on our choice of leaders, Sorry Barrack, maybe if they ran in Canada or England.................
2007-05-05 15:20:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The same one we saw when she was in office the last time
2007-05-05 15:16:32 · answer #7 · answered by tcb396 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Another one bites the dust.
That's how pathetic your question is. Not worth answering seriously.
2007-05-05 15:15:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Whichever one the polls say she should be.
2007-05-05 15:34:49 · answer #9 · answered by Frank 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It depends on the polls.
2007-05-05 15:20:35 · answer #10 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋