English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

I believe it is a perception of strength under pressure . You can find fault with all of the candidates without much effort. It is the person who the American people believe can best lead our country and his leadership quality is his biggest strength.

2007-05-05 00:54:41 · answer #1 · answered by meathead 5 · 1 1

And you could have done better under the circumstances? How ignorant can liberals be. Rudy and his counterpart from Oklahoma City, Frank Keating, would make a great ticket for President. They both did a great job under pressure. Wake up, and get off your soapbox, and find something positive for a change.

2007-05-05 01:51:08 · answer #2 · answered by ob10830 2 · 0 0

Guliiani did'nt do something quite super, it replaced into the actuality that he did'nt disintegrate in front of the media (like the media could have enjoyed him to) for the time of a substantial catastrophe. (given on the time we did no longer comprehend what all of us comprehend now relating to the terrorist) He confirmed some remnants of administration and management in the process the catastrophe. and since the media ought to no longer canine him for falling aside or crying ''the place's the government, we pick help''.They made out like he replaced into long island's savior and each and all of the crap that is going with it. the actuality that he did no longer turn in to a blubbering fool like say...... Ray Naegin and blame everybody else for his loss of management qualifications, coaching and lack of ability to do the interest he replaced into elected to do. The media performs a substantial roll interior the way the widespread public perceives international activities. They twist tips with the main suitable of them. putting their ''spin'' on their reporting so our perceptions are oftentimes one sided. they have become no extra beneficial than the tabloids you examine in line on the food market and are approximately in basic terms as stable.

2016-12-28 13:35:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

i was there. you are dead dead wrong. you disgust me with a perfuctory judgement about a man that singlehandledly united nyc. if he hadnt had the cancer treatments, hillary r wouldnt even be factor now as she wouldve been handily defeated for senator. america needs a leader. this is what we got from the clintons

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
we got a rescued city from rudy. the choice is clear.

2007-05-05 01:09:48 · answer #4 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2 0

Monday morning quarterback. You failed to give viable example since he didn't do anything with the NYFD or the NYPD

2007-05-05 01:33:39 · answer #5 · answered by cladiusneroimperator 2 · 0 0

you moveon.org pinheads just don't stop with the lies and hate do you. You will have to answer for all your BS in time.

2007-05-05 00:59:01 · answer #6 · answered by Working Stiff 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers