English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This man has been impressing me by not following the Bush clan and it's side show fueled by oil, but I was sort of dissapointed by some things he said at the debate the other day. What are you opinions on this man. Is he genuine or another corrupt official in sheeps clothing?

2007-05-04 21:15:22 · 7 answers · asked by Stephen 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

7 answers

I think he is genuine. If you look at his voting record, it would appear that he is abolutely pro_constitution. He does not seem to follow the crowd but rather makes his decision on what he feels is or is not contstitutional.

Of all the republican candidates, he is the only one I would think of voting for.

2007-05-05 05:44:45 · answer #1 · answered by afreshpath_admin 6 · 1 1

He's genuine.

There is no bigger skeptic than me, just look at my questions. But i'm firmly behind this man. I've listened to countless interviews by him and think that he is a true patriot.

Unfortunately, i dont think he has a chance of winning due to his lack of funds and the way the media will rip into him if he starts to gather any threatening momemtum.

Paul is the best thing that could happen to America.

2007-05-04 21:40:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 1 · 1 0

Ron Paul is one of the favorites for the US Presidency because of his views on war and economy. However, there are doubts about his personality and could be another corrupt President in the making.

VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if Ron Paul will likely win.

2007-05-04 21:19:25 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

they are all posturing assholes.
they say what is popular opinion in this country at the time of election. it is a tactic we all fall for, because the only other option is to just not vote, which is the option i choose. I cannot believe any of them anymore. I am not lazy, i follow politics, I watch the news, I just have a moral objection to choosing between tweedle dee and tweedle dumb.
most people have their heads up their butts. they think "well I have to vote, its what americans do". wrong, what americans do is fight for change, protest for change, speak out against injustice. If the only way to do this becomes refusing to vote at all, rather than just picking the less offensive canidate, so be it. i think to put the only truth and honor i have in this world, which is my word backed by my beliefs, behind someone who i find only "better than the other guy" is wrong.

2007-05-04 21:26:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I don't think he is part of the bush clan. I like his stance on immigration (seems to be against Bush amnesty), but I'll have to wait & see.

2007-05-04 21:22:50 · answer #5 · answered by Bluefast 3 · 0 0

new world order?

he's a libertarian... so i'd say... nope!
he's much further right than bush is

2007-05-04 21:21:22 · answer #6 · answered by Steve C 4 · 0 0

If he was part of theNWO he would be in Bushco.

2007-05-04 21:17:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers