What did you find when you looked in my soul?

Question

did you find what you were looking for? I hope so. Tell me about what you seen there? Can you do that? 2 points and 10 to the winner, LOL

"I couldn't see a thing, it was black in there. Sorry, but somebody was bound to say it."

I know that you are sorry or you wouldn't say it, but at least be brave if you are going to, you think no you don't think either or you would know better right? LOL LOL LOL at you thanks

"that it was for sale.." no wrong again, wrong, wrong, wrong, but thanks for not saying you are sorry, LOL LOL LOL.

Answer 1

A person searching for answers...like me.

Answer 2

Zero. For there is no such entity or thing or existent as to frame it so, which can be possessed by such possessives such as the syntax and term "my soul" would indicate.

Soul possesses but is not possessed. Soul Is.

One can indeed say "my mind" for in this case, Soul acknowledges that the mind is in its good keeping; it is, say, on lease and will at some 'time' be given up after such time as the mind has served the purpose for which it was created and intended.

Now, one can say my body, for again the body is what is the belonging.

But to say "my soul" is an impossibility. ' You' 'are' Soul yet merely expressing in one of its countless forms...

You 'are' Soul. A person 'is' Soul. And while in the physical realm, Soul is himself or herself. But scarcely is this Soul, truly.

When one speaks of Soul, or speaks of himself, who do you think is expressing? It is Soul. Soul is the true reflexive law: It is equal to Itself and is what all other things It possesses have in common, or what we ascribe to using the term "my."

"My" is simply an echo. That's all.

You are Soul... I am Soul... which has charge of those properties or embodiments to which I or you can assign the possessive word "my."

I am soul and I have a mind, a body. But these cannot possess me, Soul...or for comfort sake here, we can frame this using the term 'the Soul' for convenience on behalf of semantics and this thing we call the Mind. But this is not quite on point to use this... For it points to something outside oneself, which is wholly impossible.

If I were to look in, I will see but you in still another possessive of which you have charge. More fiery than the physical expression of you, it shall be much closer to essence, devoid of all coarse layers of which you are in charge -- and this, absolutely because of necessity and in order to arrive at the very thing you fancy others would find if they looked.

But of course, they could not, for only Soul can see Soul, which is to say, another Soul. And literally this by 'reason' (for want of a better word) of which two souls can indeed blend and occupy the same existence, because Soul is not (that is, I am not -- you are not) matter, energy, space nor time, and therefore does not conform to such limits and laws of physics or anything that the mind could possibly conceive, because the mind cannot conceive of anything that so surpasses its ability to conceive of what that might be or is.

In the physical realm, the signatures of the Heart will express in the eyes, around the eyes, and in the very body language itself, for little is so honest and forthcoming as these portals for Soul Itself.

Soul 'has' 'that' reflex and is afforded that power to allow Truth to peer through, which the mind cannot obscure nor do anything about.

Answer 3

I couldn't see a thing, it was black in there. Sorry, but somebody was bound to say it.

Answer 4

A spark of the Divine :-)

Answer 5

I saw perfection.

I saw us.

Love and blessings Don

Answer 6

yup!

i found a friend and i was searching for it too.

you have got a nice image of a friend in your soul. he he.

:)

Answer 7

a mirror of mine :) twin souls !

Answer 8

chicken soup

Answer 9

Well I saw Myself there !!!

Answer 10

that it was for sale...........