"I will veto any legislation that weakens current federal policies and laws on abortion, or that encourages the destruction of human life at any stage," he wrote.
...
"Bush has already threatened to veto legislation, passed by the House and Senate in different forms this year, that would ease restrictions on federally funded embryonic stem cell research. He killed a similar stem cell bill last year in the first veto of his presidency."
What does this mean? I would like to be able to understand it more. Would he move to try and ban abortion? It is legal in my state...
Any opinions or information would clarify things for me.
Thanks : ]
2007-05-04 15:54:32 · 7 answers · asked by Cassie 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Mr Bush is against abortion, hon. Mr. Bush is also against giving any government of any country who is making birth control available to its people any foreign aid from the United States*.
Mr. Bush is against stem cell research, because he believes a clump of cells that has no nervous system is human.... (of course, it has the possibility to become human, just as I have the possibility to learn Chinese. The next backward step is to say that every human egg is crying to be fertilized to be a person... and in parts of India, it is indeed "sinful" not to fertilize every egg, even if by rape.
*When I was in Nepal in 2002, the government had a campaign going to encourage couples to limit the size of their families.... This government, under Mr. Bush, pulled foreign aid from Nepal two weeks after those billboards went up along Ring Road.... in Katmandu......(every square inch that can grow anything in Nepal is being farmed...every single square inch. Garbage is thrown onto the glaciers... as they melt..... those waters form the Ganges River, which, sadly is polluted even before it is water....) The country is so crowded, the only places that are "wild" are a few reserves, which are areas that can grow little. But poaching by starving farmers is common... just like in Africa.. Nepal desperately needs to limit its population growth.... desperately..)
So yes, hon, Mr Bush is against abortion, against birth control, and against science. Mr. Bush is for his cronies. Mr. Bush really doesn't care for the working public... His entire life has proven than.
(If Mr Bush really believed in this war, his daughters are perfectly capable of flying helicopters, or serving in the military... do you see them signing up??? I don't either.)
2007-05-04 16:14:11 · answer #1 · answered by April 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As someone else said he wants to leave it as is.
Remember the stem cell research bill as you referred to it is actually the embryonic stem cell research funding bill.
The difference is it only addresses the embryonic method of stem cell research and the bill was about whether or not to federally fund it or let it go on with private funding.
2007-05-04 16:00:01 · answer #2 · answered by sociald 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It proves he's an fool and that Democrats are liars. The study that have appeared into the intel actuall tutor the alternative of what Kucinich claims. The NIE became into no longer doctored. It became into (Clintonappointed) CIA chief guideline, no longer Bush, who stated it became right into a "slam dunk" that Saddam Hussein had WMD stockpiles. Democrats in 2002 stated a similar element that Bush stated; their excuse became into/is "properly, we've been in basic terms following the intelligence". 2004 Senate Intelligence record shown that. different autonomous comments shown that. And now the Senate Democrats tried to make hay, yet they only have been given uncovered by utilising the Republicans for their hypocrisy while the Republicans used rates from Senator Rockefellar to tutor that Democrats and Bush have been asserting the *same element*. Bush, and the Democrats, and foriegn intelligence businesses, *all* genuinely believed Saddam Hussein became into harboring WMDs. And its became into clean Saddam had intentionally cultivated that concept as a showing of potential, and it became clean that Saddam's WMD courses have been nonetheless in existence whether the stockpiles weren't. the biggest lie approximately Iraq is the Democrat lie that Bush lied. He did no longer. Kucinich is in basic terms a media hound. Even i could desire to assert: "representative Kucinich has acted in a manner opposite to his have confidence as member of Congress and subversive of constitutional government to the bias of the reason for regulation and justice and to the show up harm of the persons of the US. Wherefore, Dennis Kucinich, by utilising such habit, is in command of an impeachable offense warranting removal from workplace." and that i may well be superb! Kucinich is a clean and present possibility to the protection and prosperity persons of a.
2016-12-17 04:32:10 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Progress has been made to protect unborn babies...like Doctors can't partially deliver a baby except the head and then stab the baby in the neck and shove the scissors up into the brain..like they used to be able to do.
Bush does not want to go back ot such practices.
2007-05-04 16:00:44 · answer #4 · answered by gcbtrading 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is anti abortion. He is anti stem cell research also.
2007-05-04 15:57:59 · answer #5 · answered by JJ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is strongly against abortion. These comments relate to his opposition of making abortions easier to get.
2007-05-04 15:58:11 · answer #6 · answered by Liam M 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think he just wants to keep the laws the same as they are now.
2007-05-04 15:57:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋