It is either Hayden/Gilchrist or McGrath & co to drive home the advantage in the beginning.
But to be able to do that you must be really well prepared.What do you say?
2007-05-04 14:12:14 · 5 answers · asked by karikalan 7 in Sports ➔ Cricket
In almost all their matches the trend was decided in the first 10-15 overs.
2007-05-04 14:14:36 · update #1
Mr lara is,give credit where it is due,purely in cricket talent.
2007-05-04 15:58:58 · update #2
I feel this was possible only because of the gap between Aussies and the rest.
2007-05-04 16:36:16 · update #3
yes first you cheat
then you gonna beat
the way to be beaters
take the path of cheaters
so mr karikala
is that what your team gonna take next
gilchrist played that way cuz they had known only by cheating
they could win
if they had played it sunday ...50 overs & gilchrist played
with out Squash ball...fair umpires ruled..
i am day dreamin here eh...
this ICC and Speed all are under obligation to Big Australia Continent.that is the truth
they do whatever to beat srilanka cuz
if they played fair & squre Oz would be doomed
so gilchist took the wrong way
its acrime
so he is asorta criminal
for honest Fans
down with cheaters
2007-05-04 17:46:07 · answer #1 · answered by ♥SMARNY♥ 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What I have observed after watching the matches played by Australia is that they start attacking from the word go. If any team are able to take 3 or Australian wickets within the first over or if any team plays against Australia without loosing any wicket within the 15 overs, Australian team comes under pressure and the opposition can take advantage from that position.
2007-05-07 10:01:40 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mate you got it right,most of the teams Do not have players who can preform in big games.
All the teams have great players to deliver the best in favorable conditions it is the Aussies who rule the world in all forms of cricket.
2007-05-04 18:21:33 · answer #3 · answered by SRK'S KNIGHT RIDERS 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you are right. Not only that, I believe that they had a unwavering belief , not only in themselves, but their team mates.
If you look at Gilchrist, all his inning es were pretty poor by his standard. but he was supplemented by his mates. In the final, Hayden did not have his usual average but Gilchrist found form, and then all the bowlers performed. Compare individual players to other teams individual players and 95% of the time, their ability is equal. I think it was their mental attitude and determined self-belief in themselves that made the difference.
2007-05-04 14:22:09 · answer #4 · answered by ausie down under 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think you are right. But this happens for all the cricket playing nation. If they have one or two early wickets the team is in great advantage.
2007-05-04 16:13:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋