but u only liked him/her as a friend.
2007-05-04 13:57:57 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I should say not. If I am going to marry a guy, he's got to be kissable, at least to me, anyway. Rich or not, if he ain't fine, he won't be mine! I just made that up. OOOOOHHH!
2007-05-04 14:05:22 · answer #1 · answered by Hot Coco Puff 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
At first, read all the oppinions, but don't let others to decide, instead of you.
Think of all the details: Are you thinking of him as a really good friend of you, when even kissing him is unpleasant for you? Are you sure that the positives of being richman's wife won't dissapear over the time, while the negatives may not? Do you think you would never fall in love with him?
Try to imagine all the possibilities, make your mind to build tens or even hundreds of pictures of your future life, with as many variants and particulars, as you can. Give yourself a few days before coming up with the Big Decision. Good luck.
2007-05-04 14:18:13 · answer #2 · answered by Miroslav G 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
My answer is: Never.
Not because of the kissing. It's possible to love someone dearly without the kissing part (some people are not into kissing).
LOVE is much more than kissing. I would not marry someone I did not love. LOVE is much deeper than money or personal possessions. Real love unlocks our greatest potential as human beings leading to happiness that money cannot possibly buy. If this occurs, money may come your way. Happiness can lead to money, but money cannot lead to happiness.
Let me ask you this: Was Anna Nicole a happy person?
2007-05-04 14:26:08 · answer #3 · answered by bedros 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
never, wealth only goes so far in happiness. So what if you live in luxury for your whole life, after maybe a year you won't care anymore. It will be just the same day to day. If you don't love them then there is no point marrying them. If I loved a girl, I will marry her no matter if she is rich or poor or in between. I'll love her for her and no have assets she has. If as a friend tell them, and find the perfect person for you.
2007-05-04 14:04:43 · answer #4 · answered by t_nguyen62791 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No and I wouldn't give it a second thought.
What good is a marriage without love? and dying to get to kiss them? Love and intimacy are very important in a marriage.
Money is not the most important thing in the world.
Marrying for money is doomed for failure.
This is why many men have this generalization that women marry for money! And also why marriage is taken for granted in this country. I bet if you weren't allowed to ever divorce, people would be more serious about who they marry.
2007-05-04 14:01:24 · answer #5 · answered by (no subject) 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO NO NO!!!! Money may bring short term happiness, but true love will bring long term joy. I would rather have the joy. A cute book that discusses this topic is called "Mr. Maybe" by Jane Green. It is a fun read, and it will give you another answer to your question.
2007-05-04 14:04:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope
2007-05-04 13:59:42 · answer #7 · answered by kl?? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
if i needed the money desperately.... i would... ehhee... but seriously.. I wont.. I don't have feelings for him... money is nothing when you don't love the person... if you marry him, you wont be happy... im sure one will say it will make them happy if there is money and lots and lots of it.. but money wouldn't last forever... what will happen then...
If there is love, whether your wealthy or poor, you wont need lots of money, you will be contented with what you have...
2007-05-04 14:11:04 · answer #8 · answered by ezenz9_ 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How rich are we talking? Like Brittany or Oprah rich?? HELL YEAH...Do you actually think that goof stedmann has ever seen Oprah let alone kissed her and I bet he doesnt have to lift a finger for anything, besides look at Bill Gates goofiest man alive and YES you guessed it MARRIED !!!!!!
2007-05-04 14:01:12 · answer #9 · answered by Steve K 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
NO WAY!!!! I would rather be happy and content with little or nothing than to be rich and miserable.
2007-05-04 14:34:27 · answer #10 · answered by t_tyme724 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋