If not why? We should have one method at least that every person in the world can communicate with.
2007-05-04 11:20:17 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I know there is a US version of sign language
2007-05-04 11:54:54 · update #1
ASL is likely the most common, but no.
Sign language is still a representative language that has a corresponding language as a reference point.
2007-05-04 11:47:20 · answer #1 · answered by guru 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's called Music: The Universal Language.
2007-05-05 09:43:39 · answer #2 · answered by Alex 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With the exception of arabic, hebrew and ciryllic languages, almost all other languages have the same alphabet letters. Sign language is based on the formation of letters and numbers and the picture of an object ... which are almost universal.
I dare to say most people using sign language can understand most other signers ... but American sign is, sadly, like most things American too individualistic.
2007-05-04 18:29:12 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think flashing a smile, waving, or giving the bird is probably the closest that we'll get to a universal sign language.
2007-05-04 19:20:59 · answer #4 · answered by V 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sign language is univeral i believe. I have been told that anyways. Im sure there are variations from one country to another but most is the same.
2007-05-04 18:29:12 · answer #5 · answered by kellieanne h 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes they sure can...
I'm talking about the language of globalisation.
Is you say Coca Cola everyone will understand you, then Nike,Adidas, Mc Donalds, L'oreal, Max Factor...and so on...
Take care!
2007-05-04 20:00:01 · answer #6 · answered by Aquamarine 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the smile is univeral at least
2007-05-04 18:30:03 · answer #7 · answered by Mayonaise 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you dont have to speak with someone to speak with someone. all you have to do is pay attention.
2007-05-05 21:33:03 · answer #8 · answered by madman8718 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋