English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Doesn't his stance counter as an adverse contradiction in terms?

2007-05-04 11:07:53 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

And please: No "Liberals are destroying babies!" rhetoric. I find it, I report it as abuse. Understand?

2007-05-04 11:09:00 · update #1

20 answers

While I know what you are trying to say it seems that they are totally different ,
Why is Bush against womens right to choice it is simple,
it is called organized religion , Regardless of what your religion is (I am baptist and I totally in favor of a woman having the right to choice) most organized religions frown on the whole abortion thing , Republicans sometimes tend to take the most popular (that does not always mean right) stance and regardless of ur religion , as a whole organized religion groups carry a lot of wait in DC
Why is he Pro-war
because it is romantic ---- Romantic not realistic as a whole people when they think of war think of Johnny going off to fight in a foreign country while suzie home maker is staying home waiting for her man to come home,
However it is unrealistic, I think he has totally lost all his senses no one knows why we are over there and wjy all our soliders are dying . While i mourn the loss, you have to realize they knew what they were signing up for however Bush needs to figure out why they are still there

2007-05-05 16:07:30 · answer #1 · answered by cdog61 2 · 0 1

nicely, first of all.. the "controversial thoughts" that you suggested are both unfaithful, misrepresented, or not severe. unfaithful: Anti-Christmas, Anti-faith Misrepresented: professional-abortion, professional-Tax, professional-Socialism not severe: professional-gay marriage (believing contained in the equality of guy is an American concept, not severe in us of a.) Your economic premise is fake. the proper 5% he's speaking about isn't employer capital income, that is the personal income of CEOs of major businesses. i do not care in the experience that they can't purchase yet another LearJet because they ought to pay extra taxes for social classes. They were given their wealth by the exploitation of the operating unfavourable besides, they can discover the money for to provide some back, and considering that they are not solid adequate human beings to pay solid wages and promises health care etc. to the operating classification, they are frequently compelled to so a thoughts as i'm in contact. your finished element about tax price cuts for a employer as against someone make no experience to me, and that i'm not particular what you're speaking about, sorry.... Bush gave a higher price of tax relief (as in percentage-smart) to the richest human beings in his tax cuts.. i'm not ordinary adequate to be at a loss for words through the theory that wealthy human beings might want to be getting extra truly money back, and that i strongly doubt different liberals are both, as an finished. So actually, you're lacking lots, in my opinion.

2016-12-05 08:50:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's moronic liberals like you that greatly amuse me. you people are the most evil, hateful, vitriolic people on the planet and even when you've pathetically tried to close god out of school, or give a woman the right to choose, when it isn't her choice to make, it's god's, or better yet how about babie's rights, since you people claim to be into human rights so much, did you ever stop to ask the baby if they'd like to be killed or not?

And that's another thing, you slap these BS PC names on issues, to cover up your real intent, sich as abortion. It's really murder, but you libs don't have the guts to call it what it is. Or troop deployment, when what you really mean is cut and run surrender. You switch the terms and rules that suit your mood for the moment, because you can't commit to anything. and when rightly challenged you can't answer the questions posed to you. You just spin, spin spin in hopes that it will go away, but the problems that you libs created don't go away until and unless we americans solve them for you. Face it, you have no solutions, only complaints. You're negative when you need to be positive. You look for the worst in people because you're not happy within yourself. How about cleaning up your own mess before you start looking for the faults in others around you?

Your ridiculous assertion is as pathetic as your ideology. What the hell does the President being against abortion have to do with being for the war? And by the way moron, ever hear of 9/11? I was there that day and we were attacked by a bunch of middle-eastern murder rats who want you DEAD !!! What part of this don't you freakin liiberals get???

They don't give a rat's *** what your political affiliation is. If you're an american(and clearly you're a pathetic ecuse for one,) they want you DEAD. It's like the movie the terminator. You people want to hold some moronic peace treaty and sayance with these maniacs. They can't be logiced or reasoned with. They want you dead and that's it. Until you get that through your dense heads, you'll never wake-up from your kool-aid coma!!

And yes, Liberals who created abortion do murder innocent babies and God will deal with you someday, the God you don't believe in, until you need him on your deathbed. Go ahead report me, but then what are you going to do, report all of us and cry to your mommy that uh, these evil american republicans don't agree with me? WAAAH? And you blame the president to anyone who will listen to your rantings and say the election was fixed and that his daddy did it for him? Whose the baby now libs? Whose the baby now? You are and when you can't win legitimately, you try and fix the courts and undermine the system to get your way but it will never work because you forgot one thing: This is America and people here have the power, not your socialist communists sympathizers like Geroge Zeros.

Get a life you jerkoff!!

2007-05-04 15:19:54 · answer #3 · answered by Patriotic Man 3 · 1 1

And now you've come to the crux of the hypocrisy of the Christian right. They scream and yell about voting for a president who is against abortion, and when they get one, what does he do? Not only did Bush completely ignore anti-abortion legislation when he and his party completely controlled the white house, congress and the supreme court from 2002 to 2006, but he starts a massive war killing thousands of Americans, tens of thousands of Iraqis, and dividing this nation into left and right wing fanatics.
Abortion isn't an issue- it's a trick these politicians play on voters to get them worried about something else. Anything else, except for the real issues- poverty, disease, inequality, injustice.

2007-05-04 11:20:01 · answer #4 · answered by TooMuch 4 · 0 5

No contradiction at all. Soldiers choose to go the the military because they believe in the war and WANT to fight in it

Aborted babies will never have that choice...

2007-05-04 11:16:04 · answer #5 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 6 3

The logic of the (first) question is flawed, so it is impossible to answer as posed. Therefore the answer to the second question is "NO".

Being anti-abortion and believing that the war in Iraq is justified are two entirely separate and distinct matters. They are not inherently linked.....except by those who pose purposefully inflammatory questions.

As I recall that too can be considered grounds for reported abuse.

2007-05-04 11:13:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6 4

I am not sure where the connection between the War on Terror or the War in Iraq and abortion is. Your comparison is absolutely ignorant and absurd.

2007-05-04 11:19:27 · answer #7 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 3 2

babies are innocent, jihadis are murderous thugs who kill and maim , and also kill babies, by blowing them up or using them as human shields. US soldiers dont target innocent people, but the people hiding behind the babies, and women and children, to kill them, so the thugs can no longer kill and threaten the world with terrorism.

have you lost the ability to reason?

I would bet a dollar that you have used mind altering drugs.

2007-05-04 11:16:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

if bush had to do it all over again would that coward hide behind his dads *** all over again, if we all grow up and see the big picture here, his dad is all behind this war, telling him what to do, his dad got him elected, his younger brother helped to, what more do you want, we all might be dead befour we here the truth of this war, i know his dad will take it to his grave, i am sure all the bushes will,

2007-05-04 11:28:12 · answer #9 · answered by birddog 2 · 1 2

an absolutely ridiculous comparison and is an adverse contradiction of terms.

report me, loser.

oh, bravo, patriotic man!!

2007-05-04 11:18:43 · answer #10 · answered by Mustardseed 6 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers