The philosopher Bavick suggests that," The necessity of the Laws of Nature are a logical necessity." In short, the specific scientific rules which govern our universe are shaped in such a way that these rules must be logically necessary.
If the premise is suggested that our only source of information about scientific law are derived from our repeated experiences, i.e. seeing the sun rise every morning, then...
How do our experiences with Time affect our ability to say whether or not Science is a logical necessity?
2007-05-04 09:39:51 · 8 answers · asked by reverendlovejoy75 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Well, I learned that to prove your theory, your argument has to be presented as premisee, premis, conclusion. Fine, but more often than not more than two premises are necessary to prove a point, and even that's not sufficient enough sometimes. The laws of nature state that everything in nature is perfect, everything is subject to mutation, all living things must die eventually. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. What goes up must come down. Gravity always wins. Science is a logical necessity in that is provides material proof for questions we have, and solutions as well. We wouldn't have any medicines or cross bred plants or inventions if we were sans science. Like any other tool, it can be used for good and evil. We always hope that one's genius will be used for the advancement of the common good, but human behavior is not always predictable, and not everyone follows logic, moral or ethical law. See, all that and I didn't even answer your question ☻
2007-05-04 10:27:59 · answer #1 · answered by Hot Coco Puff 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Physical experience is relative to overriding and elemental factors of circumstance...such as time. Which ultimately makes them irrelevant to effect, or value of occurence.
The laws of nature tell me that unless existence is lived in exponentially conscientious consideration of all that surrounds, we eventually fail to exist. In other words we must have some value within the ever balancing equation.
These laws as you call them exist without us, they always have and always will. Mutually considerate orientation is a necessity not a science.
Name a successful species that defends or depends upon science?
We don't write the rules, and unfortunately we collectively abuse circumstance afforded our consideration.
Who it is said, or who we think or imagine we are. What we profess or preach or teach or who we follow...does not reflect worthiness. What we do within balancing relationship does. There is no plausible explanation or deniability beyond what is done. No matter how old, young, cool, connected, disadvantaged, disabled, alienated, afflicted, accomplished, devout, traditional, well off, lowly, lofty, frustrated of destitute.
2007-05-04 17:03:19 · answer #2 · answered by weofearth 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think a question like this can be answered with absolute positivity. However we can only conjecture, and my conjecture in response to your question is that science is there merely to help us make sense of how the universe operates and help us understand how we can utilise it for our benefit, I dont think its a matter of whether its a logical necessity or not, the fact is that we need science to enable us to improve our predicament and ease suffering.
2007-05-04 16:57:53 · answer #3 · answered by Mini 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Laws of Nature tell me to...
Give it up...the "truth" ain't there...
We made it up, and so beware
All "words" are lies, comin' from the man
We have no voice...scream, if you can
In the end, it's all the same
Twin spiral staircase, a broken chain
"Heaven" is a brand new car
And only that will take you far...
So, fill it up with SUPA, bey-bey...!
The world will "eat" you...
If you let it...
2007-05-04 17:02:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nature and science were existed before humans....they operate through "Laws".....and we only discover these laws by "Time"....and we also gradually discover that these laws are connected together by "Logic"....then by logic we discover more laws....then we form a "Science" which is a group of logical laws.
and that necessities one superpower ruling all these things together....
so God existence is a a logical necessity.
2007-05-04 17:19:36 · answer #5 · answered by PLUTO 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nature rules. Humans scurry around creating their little zones of safety but when they over run the 'feeding/breeding' ground they will be culled by nature, one way or another.
2007-05-05 07:37:42 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Animals with canine teeth (lions, tigers, etc) are carnivores.
Animals with molar teeth (cows, horses, etc) are herbivores.
Animals with both (HUMANS) are omnivores, i.e., can eat either.
The weak are always culled from the herd.
Ergo, anyone that tells you that humans shouldn't eat meat is an idiot and should be culled from the herd.
2007-05-04 16:50:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science is great, but Nature is wise and VERY consistent. Do not try to bend the spoon...lol
Good luck!
2007-05-04 18:18:10 · answer #8 · answered by Alex 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋