Republican's top canidates are: Giuliani, Romney, McCain, Paul and the Democrat's top canidates are: Clinton, Obama, Edwards and Biden.
Giuliani and Romney seem like the best canidates for president from either party in my opinion.
What are your thoughts?
2007-05-04 08:02:36 · 10 answers · asked by BMD 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I agree so far.. still waiting for Fred Thompson to enter the ring though
2007-05-04 08:07:33 · answer #1 · answered by Antiliber 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
No. Romney is an empty suit, Guilaini a fear mongering blowhard, McCain a tired old man with no new ideas, in fact none of these three offers any new thoughts on anything. Ron Paul is an honest guy, and I agree with about half of what he supports, especially what he had to say about foriegn policy last night. It's hard to believe that ayone who lists Guiliani, Romney and McCain along with Ron Paul understands what Ron Paul is all about as he is diametrically opposed to the the other three.
I'm not thrilled with any of the democratic candidates but I support the democratic party and beleive any of the dems offer and much better prospect of getting the country back of teh right track. I kind of liked that guy from Alaska, he was telling it like it is...
2007-05-04 15:17:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Biden can wipe the floor with Guiliani or Romney. He'll never get the Dem nomination, but if he did it would be a Democratic landslide, I really believe. He'd also be a superb president.
Dems... Clinton has a ceiling, electorally, and she would suffer for not having a particular explanation for her candidacy. Obama is a question mark, electorally - he could rise to the stratosphere or be a real bust. Edwards, I have to admit, isn't showing the stuff for a general election, IMO.
Repubs... McCain loses to anyone, even Edwards. Paul is not a top candidate - please be real. Guiliani, if he shows the guts to be pro-choice in that 5/3 debate, will be formidable but not a shoe-in. Romney is ultimately an elitist - it just hasn't come out yet, but it would in a general - and he can't win from that alone.
2007-05-04 15:12:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO!!! If I HAD to pick a Republican; it would probably be Ron Paul. But the ones best suited to be president in my opinion are; Edwards and Richardson, both on the Democratic side. I am pulling for Edwards because of his un-apologetic criticism of himself for his Iraq war vote. Anyone can make a mistake, it's admitting you were wrong that's hard! I strongly believe that above all; we could definitely use such honesty in the White House in 08! What do you think?
2007-05-04 15:21:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what you mean. Politics asside, I'd say that Clinton, Guiliani, and McCain have the experience, charisma and competence to handle the office. Obama just needs a few more years, maybe a term as Governor, or some other executive office, to make the grade.
2007-05-04 15:10:33 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
None of them are worth a crap. They are all too old, too stuck in their ways to actually listen to what America wants.
Democrats hit up the immigrants, and the republicans hit up the religious right.
Both are predictable and stale.
2007-05-04 15:11:19 · answer #6 · answered by It's Kippah, Kippah the dawg 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Not really, I don't see a real conservative among them. One thing we cannot let happen is passing the Liberal's tax bill.
2007-05-04 15:55:31 · answer #7 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No the Republicans are not better suited, just better at hiding their errors. Democrats are not any better, they just are good at blaming their blunders on Republicans.
2007-05-04 15:14:24 · answer #8 · answered by happy_southernlady 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I never seen a bigger bunch of girlie men in one place.
2007-05-04 17:46:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree, but really, i don't think any of them are great. we need another regan.
2007-05-04 15:10:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋