You mean James Hewitt.Harry was born two years before Hewitt and Diana were formally introduced and started their affair.James Hewitt happens to bear a strong resemblance to a young Johnny Spencer,Diana's beloved father.There is a picture of Johnny Spencer as a young man in the book Diana:The Portrait by Rosalind Coward that caught my eye immediately because of the resemblance between these two men who were in Diana's life.You should also look at pictures of Sarah Spencer McQuordale,Diana's sister;she and Harry also bear a strong resemblance.If you click on each of the links below,you can
see the picture of Diana's father that I am referring to;you'll see the strong resemblance between Spencer and Hewitt.
http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/cleogirlbird/edwardspencer1924.jpg
http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/cleogirlbird/_38269492_hewitt300.jpg
You can also visit www.althorp.com/SpencerFamily/ to see the Earl's picture there.
I also suggest that you go to
http://.news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_
news/2273498.stm
for the article "Hewitt denies Harry" which reads:"Prince Harry was "already walking" by the time his relationship with Diana began, he told The Sunday Mirror.
Speaking in the paper, he said: "Admittedly the red hair is similar to mine and people say we look alike.
"I have never encouraged these comparisons and although I was with Diana for a long time I must state once and for all that I'm not Harry's father.
"When I met Diana, he was already a toddler." "
It's time for people to drop the very ill-informed opinion that Harry is Hewitt's son;he isn't.People who insist upon it are doing a grave disservice to
to the memory of the late Princess of Wales as well as to her son.
2007-05-04 14:44:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You mean James Hewitt. He may look like him but he is not Harry's father. Harry's red hair can be attributed to the Spencer family which has always carried a ginger hair gene. Prince Charles was rather appalled by this because he hated the fact that Harry looked so much like his mother's side. Diana was lonely but I think its wrong to say that she was having an affair when she hadn't began it yet. She didn't want to take that route, her husband pushed her to it. And besides, Charles was her first boyfriend ever, not to say its right, but really, she just wanted companion ship with someone remotely close to her age.
2007-05-05 06:32:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Louzzer 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps because he is Mark Phillip's son. I believe this issue has been raised before, but I am not certain that it has been proven either way through DNA testing. The British royal family probably prefers not to touch this with a ten foot pole, because they are already on the outs with the public, many of whom want to abolish the monarchy. They dared not raise the issue while Diana lived because Prince Charles certainly had provided her with enough arrows in her quill to shoot at him and the royal family for a lifetime. Charles' continuing affair with Camilla Parker Bowles meant that he could have little to say should Diana come up with a little package of her own as a result of any tryst which she might have outside the confines of marriage. To expose her would be to expose himself to public scrutiny and ridicule. Now that Diana is dead, what's the point? The royals cannot hurt her any longer, and the boy who has been raised as a member of the royal family could be hurt immensely, the victim of a train wreck which he had no hand in causing. Charles must certainly be aware of this fact, and as penance for his own indiscretions will probably remain mute on this issue, unless asked point blank whether Harry is his son. Then undoubtedly he will deny that Harry is any man's son but his own, because Diana still has plenty of family and friends ready to jump to her defense even some 10 years after her death.
2007-05-04 08:36:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by MathBioMajor 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I personally don't think he looks like Mark Phillips. James Hewett on the other hand....
2007-05-04 13:01:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by EvilFairies 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think you are referring to James Hewitt. This is well known.
2007-05-04 19:08:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by brainstorm 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
hummm dna? does it really matter. if charles says its his son then it is.
2007-05-04 08:07:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ida 5
·
1⤊
0⤋