English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

its said that FDA may approve of cloned chickens and cows for food. why is it even neccesary to clone those animals? i think its kinda sketchy. we dont know enought about the affects.

2007-05-04 07:02:30 · 12 answers · asked by M B 2 in Science & Mathematics Zoology

12 answers

Why is it neccessary to clone those animals? Probably because millions of people on earth are dying or are on the path to die of starvation. Cloned animals are genetically identical to the original animal. In addition cloning could bring back extinct or re-populate endangered animals as well. Believe it or not clones can occur naturally. "Clones occur naturally during the asexual reproduction of some organisms and unicellular micro-organisms, or when two genetically identical individuals are produced accidentally, as when two identical twins develop from one single fertilized egg. " AKA identical twins. Some say we don't know how safe this is, there has been tests the meat and the milk is identicaly to the hosts. It does have down-sides, some people are fearful of changes, another regarding thinking it as playing "God", that they should be labeled as "cloned" (which they are not, FDA is not making a specific cloned label)

2007-05-04 07:11:00 · answer #1 · answered by jay k 6 · 0 0

evaluate ailments like chook flu and mad cow, that would want to spread a lot extra right away between animals that are genetically similar. The extra well-known those ailments are, the harder they're going to be to administration, and the further likely human beings will be contaminated. i'd also be careful of the cloning procedure, because it would nonetheless have some unidentified result on the animal, which will be possibility-free in case you devour fairly, yet risky in case you devour it each day. Or, the approach will be possibility-free on condition that performed completely, it really is way less likely if cloning will develop into extra time-honored. And what occurs after various generations of cloning? Are the animals extra likely to advance tumors that pump out tremendous portions of risky elements? i'd pick to understand why it really is being seen? Is it more cost-effective to generate a clone in a laboratory than to reproduce animals obviously? Is it nicely well worth the prospect of a huge demise contained in the herd?

2016-11-25 02:10:46 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

This is another example of the government letting business do what they want without care. No one knows what the long term effects of cloned animal food on the human body. The other problem is that when you narrow down the gene pool you leave open the problem of a disease that will destroy your animals. If they are all genetically the same they may be more susceptible to disease. We are playing craps with our food supply and someone is going to lose.

2007-05-04 07:13:37 · answer #3 · answered by diogenese_97 5 · 0 0

I agree that we wouldn't really know the side effects of eating a cloned animal, but I hardly doubt when they are packaged there will be any real way of telling. Unfortunatly anyone that eats meat will probably end up eating cloned animals, maybe we already are.

2007-05-04 07:10:51 · answer #4 · answered by Squeakers 4 · 0 0

I have a problem eating mammals period. I am not fanatical, just very uneasy. We don't yet know the long term effect of cloned food, further more the FDA cannot be trusted at all. It's all about commerce and not Joe Browns health.

2007-05-06 10:34:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don`t think we should eat cloned animals.
I also think cloned fruit and vegetables aren`t good.
But as a "normal" human being you can`t stop them from cloning everything they want, people always want more and more.. The worst thing is that you wouln`t even know, if the meat you are eating is from a cloned animal or not because they don`t label it.

2007-05-08 06:39:24 · answer #6 · answered by motschkal12 2 · 0 0

By definition, a cloned animal is exactly the same as the animal it was cloned from. Therefore one is just as suitable for food as the other.

2007-05-04 18:47:19 · answer #7 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 0 0

Assuming that a cloned animal is really an EXACT replica of the original animal, why would it be any different than eating the original?

2007-05-04 09:09:16 · answer #8 · answered by SavetheEmu 3 · 0 0

I am not down with that. I grew up on a farm and I can't believe that eating cloned animals is a good thing.

2007-05-04 07:10:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm so hungry I could eat a cloned horse

2007-05-04 07:05:46 · answer #10 · answered by The Guru 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers