Libs, what's the timetable of Pelosi and Reids resignation?

Question

For their treasonous acts, Pelosi meeting with terrorists and Reid undermining our brave troops

Answer 1

Democrats get a pass from the liberal media and other democrats when it comes to things like that.

But if one nose hair is out of alignment on aNY republican, its...

KARL ROVE NEEDS TO BE INVESTIGATED!

THIS ADMINISTRATION IS NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF CRIMINALS!

THEY NEED TO RESIGN IMMEDIATELY!

Answer 2

there is extra anger available than human beings really understand. I recommend truly ANGER. the unhappy then is now, regardless of each little thing the apyoffs being made--there is not something in this bill THAT enables absolutely everyone----------- THATS A FRIGGING reality---Being a con i presumed i might want to under no circumstances trust the most liberal baby-kisser in us of a yet I do--------Howard Daean suggested that this bill should be scrapped and that we ought to continuously initiate throughout. If Dean is bored stiff, you likely can only imagine HOW undesirable THIS bill fairly IS

Answer 3

Soon I hope. If that means the (R)'s that went with her also have to resign, that's fine by me. We train our military to win, not lose. Reid's comments send mixed signals to our troops. Let's win this war Dems come on.

Answer 4

I'm sure that our troops' morale must be sooo low because of what 2 senators have said or done. And I bet the insurgents are saying to themselves, "Hey, those senators say the war is already lost... let's start making more IED's!"

The only thing that's undermining our troops is not giving them the proper armored vehicles or the proper numbers to effectively quash the insurgency.

Get a clue.

Answer 5

So when IS the timetable for CONdi and BUsh to resign?

For their treasonous acts, Condi meeting with terrorists under Bush's order and undermining our brave troops in the process

Answer 6

I feel for those who have suffered from the lobotomy of truth regarding the illegal war in IRAQ;

1) Falsifying of intelligence - no weapons of mass destruction
2) Creating lies
3) Mass production of lies in the media


All done by the neo-con think tank of the soon to be impeached Dick Cheney.

Answer 7

you're a twit
We have SEPARATE BUT EQUAL branches of government. This is why the Congress is able to write and approve legislation and not just allow arbitrary laws to go into effect. This is why we have checks and balances built into the US Constitution, which seem to be back in place after the Republican led Congress abdicated their responsibility to this nation by apathetically sitting by and allowing the power grab the President has done.
Pelosi went to Syria because it was "fact finding" as is part of her JOB, considering it was to confirm what the Iraq Study Group highlighted in their recommendations to the President AND to Congress (which the President has chosen to ignore).
So if Pelosi is a traitor and committed treason, the following people also did so:
Frank Wolf ( R) Virginia,
Joseph Pitts (R) Pennsylvania and
Robert Aderholt (R) Alabama, who were in Syria 3/31/07-4/1/07
Republican Rep. Hobson (R-OH)
Darrell Issa (R) California who was in Syria 4/7/07

or this just just applies to Democrats? I guess so.
Republican apologists have tried to use the excuse that Bush "sponsored" Repbulicans to go to Syria.
If this is the case why the duplicitous behavior and the double speak?
The White House sharply criticized House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to Syria Wednesday, saying the California Democrat was undercutting efforts to isolate Damascus and send the "wrong message" but any so called " sponsored trips" by the Executive branch does neither undercut efforts to isolate Damascus nor send the wrong message? The White House's own spokesman Alex Conant said 4/2/07, the Bush administration — as a blanket policy — "discourages all of (Congress') visits" to Syria, a country believed by the White House to sponsor terrorism, yet they would go ahead and "facilitate" trips by Republicans?
Rep Darrell Issa (R-CA) said U.S. President George W. Bush had failed to promote the dialogue that is necessary to resolve disagreements between the United States and Syria.
So was he "sponsored" too? or is he a "traitor" to the cause?

Back in 1999, after then-President Bill Clinton had ordered U.S. forces to begin a massive bombing campaign and missile strikes against Yugoslavia, the House of Representatives considered a resolution supporting the mission. The leading opponent of the resolution was Tom DeLay (R-Tx), who dismissed the notion that opposing the war was in any way an affront to the troops.
In a visceral floor statement delivered in March of that year, DeLay declared, "Bombing a sovereign nation for ill-defined reasons with vague objectives undermines the American stature in the world.( isn't that ironic)
As the war progressed, DeLay condemned "(President Clinton's) war," and grumbled in April, 1999, that, "There are no clarified rules of engagement. There is no timetable. There is no legitimate definition of victory. There is no contingency plan for mission creep. There is no clear funding program. There is no agenda to bolster our overextended military. There is no explanation defining what vital national interests are at stake. There was no strategic plan for war when the President started this thing, and there still is no plan today." (sounds familiar doesn't it)

Texas Governor George W. Bush told the Seattle Post-Intelligencer on June 5, 1999: "I think it's also important for the president to lay out a timetable as to how long (U.S. troops) will be involved and when they will be withdrawn."

Bring on the selective amnesia.

Keep on telling yourself every excuse you can and pontificate to justify the hypocrisy.


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." Theodore Roosevelt
(1918)

"Gentlemen have talked a great deal of patriotism. A venerable word, when duly practised. But I am sorry to say that of late it has been so much hackneyed about that it is in danger of falling into disgrace. The very idea of true patriotism is lost, and the term has been prostituted to the very worst of purposes." —Robert Walpole 1741

Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president or any other public official...

~Theodore Roosevelt

Answer 8

Nice to see you have been listening to Sean Hannity...I think it is scheduled for the day after Bush's impeachment.

Answer 9

What's the timetable for your brain replacement?

Hopefully soon...because you are an IDIOT.

Answer 10

Amazing, you can view that as a crime but are totally blind to Bush and Cheney's violations. I didn't realize that there were still some people out there whos' mind's were still clouded by all that Bushaganda.