English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The restriction of advertisement by BCCI would not affect on the performance of players. The sponsors only chooose the players based on their performance. I think it (restriction) is the way to get more money for themselves(BCCI members) from sponsors. These ploticians and Business persons in BCCI know.. how and from where ..to get money. It is the money not improving the cricket. What did BCCI do for domestic cricket facilities....? Instead of restriction.. they should either increase more domestic tourament and /or ask players to involve in that. They should put a criteria.. minimum number of Domestic -games required for considering in selection of Indian Team. Thsi would help more interest in domestic criket and star players will have to play domestic cricket.

What's your suggestion with reason?

2007-05-04 01:55:56 · 5 answers · asked by yup_cool 4 in Sports Cricket

5 answers

Agree.. Instead of putting restriction on advertisement of players.. they should .

1. Improve and change the format, timing of Domestic cricket.
2 .Minimum Domestic Games are required by Selectors for selecting Indian Team.
3.The performance(not age) would be consider top priority and only after meeting minimum requirement otherwise NO.
4. Domestic tournament should be played at the same venue where International matched are played.
5. Indian should have two teams(money should not matter for BCCI, u know) Indian Team and a Indian Blue team which should be back of injured player or any other reason.
6.Selectors should be not by zone but by capabilities.
like Viswanath(Chairman), Vengsarkar, Madanlal,Amarnath,KapilDev, Gavasker(if he has time).

These are few suggestion.. there may be more.. you can get.

The restriction will just make these BCCI people rich.They want money anyhow.
Every one has right to make money for their better living. These crickets are only get money as long as they are playing better. After cricket life.. they need to provide BREAD-BUTTER to their family and lead his own life.
There are so many players in every sports are living poorly..

2007-05-04 03:22:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

S. Players should participate in all domestic tournaments. It is the duty of the BCCI to see that domestic and international matches do not clash. Minimum number of domestic games, minimum number of teams. Domestic games should be played in grounds where international matches are played. Only 6 to 8 venues should be developed and maintained properly. Players should be selected on the basis of their performance. They should not hide injuries. The revenue from the major venues can be used for maintaining other venues and only first class tour matches or 1 or 2 ODI's should be played. A player ,to be included in the National team should have performed consistently throughout the domestic season. He should have played a minimum of 20 to 30 first class ODI's and 10- 15 first class test matches to be included in the National team. All top cricketers should participate in domestic tournaments. They should be allowed only two advertisements per year. Per advertisement not more than 2 players be involved. Hard and bouncy wickets are necessary to help emerge young fast bowlers and also to tackle short pitch bowling.

2007-05-04 02:27:51 · answer #2 · answered by mukundan d 2 · 0 0

I completely agree with you as putting restrictions on them won't make them perform better. Players should be allowed to do endorsements as long as they do not come in the way of their practice.New comers should be given a chance and I think it is time for Sachin to retire

2007-05-04 03:46:31 · answer #3 · answered by angelena 2 · 0 0

Copy the successful Australian domestic system, as it is obviously producing the strongest cricketing nation.

2007-05-04 02:12:15 · answer #4 · answered by kanga 5 · 0 0

I agree with your views.

2007-05-04 02:17:56 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers