see the following:
let a=b..
...multiplying 'a' on both sides....
a^2=ab. (^ means exponent or power...we all know)
...subtracting 'b^2' from both sides...
a^2 - b^2= ab - b^2
since a^2 - b^2=(a+b)(a-b)
then,
(a+b)(a-b)=ab -b^2
(a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b) (taking b common on right side)
....canceling (a-b) on both sides....
we get
a+b=b...
now how is this POSSIBLE??? earlier i showed that a=b, then WHERE is the mistake in between???
2007-05-04
00:41:26
·
26 answers
·
asked by
Utkarsh V
2
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Mathematics
don't tell me that a=b=0 solves it, coz we can specify that earlier also that
a=b= any number like 1, then how come
a+b=b...ie.
1+1=1???
2007-05-04
00:47:32 ·
update #1
Unhandled Exception.
0x00FEEDBABE: Divide By Zero Error, press any key to quit.
2007-05-07 02:49:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Suppose y = x/x;
Now
y = 1 if x is not equal to zero
= undefined if x = 0;
So what you are doing is you are saying x/x = 1 when x = 0 which is not true. As I wrote x/x = undefined when x = 0. So after (a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b) your next step is wrong.
If you have studied Calculas you must know that left hand limit of x/x near zero is not equal to right hand limit of it near zero.
I hope it clears you doubt. There are many more examples of this kind. one is
a^2 = b^2
=> a = b
which is not true because if
a^2 = b^2
=> a^2 - b^2 = 0
=> (a-b)(a+b) = 0
=> (a-b) = 0 OR (a+b) = 0
=> a = b OR a = -b
=> a = +/-b
All the best.
2007-05-04 05:04:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by pushker 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Duh!!! You don't --EVER-- 'cancel' anything. What you do is --DIVIDE-- both sides by (a-b) so that you get a factor of 1 on both sides.
But, in this case, since you started off with the assumption that a = b then you divided 0 by 0 which is about as undefined as you can get.
BTW.... This little piece of legerdemain (along with several hundred common variants, all involving division by 0 in one form or another) is at least 2500 years old ☺
Doug
2007-05-04 00:54:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by doug_donaghue 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
As soon as you subtracted 'b^2' from both sides, you made both sides of the equation equal to 0!
2007-05-04 00:52:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chad H 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
looking on your college, you will be able to correctly be waiting to locate an 'astronomy for non-scientists' direction, yet once you pick to examine actual astronomy heavily, then you somewhat choose all the math you will come across. the two astronomy and physics at degree point and above are in actuality branches of arithmetic, and the mathematics may well be very checking out, at that. you're unlikely to be waiting to slide actually into around trigonometry and the Schroedinger wave equation, to point merely 2 factors, on the inspiration of an O-point, or in spite of the present call is. in step with probability you would be extra useful sticking to astronomy as a interest.
2016-10-04 09:06:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is possible only when a=b=0
Also, if a = b then a^2 - b^2 = 0
2007-05-06 04:36:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no mistake. This is true for a=b.
In fact base on your last statement:
a+ b = b
a = 0,
Now if a = 0, b = 0 which is pausible.
2007-05-04 00:52:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by az 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The problem is that when you are "....canceling (a-b) on both sides...." you are dividing by zero (since you specify that a=b so a-b=0). Obviously in maths, you can't divide by zero - if you do you get inconsistent results as you have seen.
cheers
2007-05-04 01:01:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it has to do with the fact that as you manipulate a and b, yu multiply the terms by (a-b), which, since a=b, is zero. Thus you can pretty much say anything you want since anything multiplied by 0 is 0
2007-05-04 00:50:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Shredded Cottage Cheese 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are right, It's not possible.
So in mathematics this type of equation is said as "not difined."
Because in step :- (a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b) If u want to cancle then either u have to divide equation by (a-b) or shift (a-b) to L.H.S
Then it becomes (a+b)(a-b)/(a-b)=b(a-b)/(a-b)
Here (a-b)=0
there fore equation becomes 0/0=0/0. In maths 0/0 forms are said to be not defined forms, because 0/0(zero divided by zero) is neither equal to 1 nor equal to infinity.
Hence maths tell this equation as not defined form.
2007-05-04 01:19:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anjaneya 2
·
1⤊
0⤋