2007-05-03 23:46:23 · 7 answers · asked by SHADOW 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Obahma, because its time.
2007-05-04 00:05:46 · answer #1 · answered by 123 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul, because he says what he believes, and stands up for principles, even if it's not popular. He opposed the Iraq War from the very beginning, even when the Democrats were still supporting it. I think he has a lot more credibility than most of the rest.
2007-05-04 07:38:03 · answer #2 · answered by skip742 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mitt Romney
He is articulate, he has experience and a proven track record, and a good vision on what needs to be done concerning the war in Iraq. Plus this may sound silly but when you look at him you can imagine him being president.
2007-05-04 08:39:24 · answer #3 · answered by GMP 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul, Denis Kucinich and Barak Obama. As far as I know, they had nothing to do with the NATO Jihad in Bosnia and Kosovo, had nothing to do with invading Iraq, and stand for fighting terrorism without double standards.
2007-05-04 07:39:25 · answer #4 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kucinich! He voted against the war, not just opposed it. He gave over 160 speeches opposing the war...obama gave one. Obama = full of crap. Kucinich = 100% Presidential Material.
2007-05-04 08:07:32 · answer #5 · answered by World Expert 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rudy because he is cool, open minded and not as wacky as the rest. However it creeps me out a little that he married his second cousin-they divorced but still it's creepy.
2007-05-04 06:57:49 · answer #6 · answered by Maria 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tom Tancredo, his strong support for immigration and abortion. Then again not too many questions veered his way last night.
2007-05-04 09:11:21 · answer #7 · answered by firetach2000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋