i think it was a fake the films were right, its not possible we can go there yet... especially when they did spacecraft was too primative.. they woulda fried!!! its about time they came clean with it...
2007-05-03 22:06:44 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
why have we never been back then? its a long time ... and would be good to set up a staition or something.. plus good training for other astronauts... russia never treid it either so there is something wrong...
2007-05-03 22:19:10 · update #1
I agree with you if we had been there they would be going building bases. They did a space station so why no moon base? I think it had something to do with the cold war, beating the Russians to get there. All just some kind of propaganda. otherwise they WOULD have gone back.
2007-05-04 10:37:59 · answer #1 · answered by starlight 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no matter if we used the hubble area telescope it nonetheless wouldnt be achievable to make sure the flags and left over kit from the apollo's. have self belief me, guy has walked on the moon. each and each and every arguement that the persons wjo declare he didnt has an evidence. The flag waving, no stars contained in the photographs etc. in the journey that your questioning, the flag develop into erected with wires and cameras and picture dont have the publicity to capture stars. Its an similar once you seem at photographs of the gap holiday in orbit you cant see any stars in those photographs both for the very similar reason. also if the touchdown were faked why problem doing it yet another 5 circumstances and characteristic a million challenge neally bring about tradgedy (Apollo 13)
2016-11-25 01:16:40 · answer #2 · answered by lightbourn 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All the apparent evidence I've ever seen against the moon-landings has been pretty convincingly debunked -- for example, the flag was supported by a bar, as is quite obviously the case if you watch the footage. And all this stuff about "they would have fried" is rubbish, I'm afraid.
Certainly it's _possible_ that it was faked, just as it's possible that Elvis is still alive, or that Hitler survived and had a sex change.
But it's not very likely, and the evidence points very strongly at the moon landings being for real.
2007-05-04 04:07:39 · answer #3 · answered by garik 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
How can you ignore the vast amount of evidence we have that we went to the moon 6 times. It's beyond doubt that man has stepped on the moon.
People just love a conspiracy theory.
I know puting a web address in is pointless as you could come up with 100 that say the landings are faked but theorys are 10 a penny facts are ...well facts
2007-05-03 22:39:55 · answer #4 · answered by saltydog 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
To answer your 2nd point - we haven't been back becuase America has the choice to spend US£3.5 billion on visiting the moon, or providing a public service for 275 million people. Which would prefer?!
And what kind of genius do you claim to be to know if we have the technology to reach the moon or not. I would like to where you have graduated from with such high honours before I believe your statement.
2007-05-04 06:10:46 · answer #5 · answered by Andrew W 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm sure they went to the moon. We are farther in the future than you think. We have some material that they put on the suttle to protect them from the red hot entering. Plus they enter at an angle to wherever their destination is, so they can't really get burnt but so much. It's not like they just drop out of the sky and just land wherever.
I'm sure the films are real too. The guys up there wouldn't be jumping around as high as they could in those suits if they werent on earth. Those suits are heavy you know.
Also I'd like to add that the things they need in space are rather pricing, that's why we havent really gone out ourselves. Plus we have satilies so we dont have to rick out lives going out there.
2007-05-04 04:22:09 · answer #6 · answered by Josh 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
A silly TV show said the Moon landing was faked, but later ones refute it. Some men were certainly on the moon 7/20/69. Neil Armstrong was first and soon Buzz Aldrin joined him. It is ridiculous to say the whole landing is some weird conspiracy.
2007-05-04 02:17:38 · answer #7 · answered by miyuki & kyojin 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
What about the fact that the camera's "bullseye" a little X on the screen floated behind and then in front of objects on screen? This is proof that there was editing and fake footage.
They didnt go to the moon then, it was a stunt, The US didnt even attempt trying till the US heard Russia was trying then all of a sudden we caught up with the Russians and made it there before them?
Silly Rabbit
2007-05-04 02:07:23 · answer #8 · answered by st3ven83 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Alan Shepard snuck a golf ball and a golf club to the moon, and hit it, and it flew way further than it would have on Earth. That must have been fun. How would you fake that? Too much footage to be able to have been faked
2007-05-04 01:10:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes man (a few Americans) has been to the moon a few times. For what purpose and at what astronomical expense, that is what I wonder. Stop believing urban myths. My Grandma's 3rd husband, a very backwards country type, believed the entire moon landing was a hoax, do you want to be in company with him?
2007-05-04 02:08:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋