English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Saddam still wouldn't have WMD's or Yellow Cake. and, Al Queda still wouldn't be in Iraq either. More than likely the nut in Iran wouldn't have been elected either. And, all our energies would have been directed toward Afghanistan and the actual people who attacked us on 9/11. And, the entire would would still view us with admiration and credibility. Can you imagine that?

2007-05-03 18:46:49 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

I Do Kno…The liberals and the people on the left knew what was going to happen if Bush invaded Iraq. We told all you clowns on the right exacatly how it was going to go down. We wrote our congressmen and women and our senators about it. Millions of us did that. We weren't listened to at all. Guess what? WE WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG! We told you how it would all go down and that it would be a failure. And look at it now, IRAQ IS A FAILURE and BUSH IS A FAILURE. And, it failed exactly how we said it would, key points and all. If my question is a fantasy, it is our right to fantasize about it because we told you so. And, this fantasy could have remained reality had we not gone into Iraq. It is a reminder of how Americans must be diligent about questioning our elected leaders. Dissent is patriotic. Following a despot blindly into oblivian is not.

2007-05-04 03:41:56 · update #1

14 answers

"Imagine all the people, living life in PEACE..."--John Lennon

I can imagine it, and it's a wonderful thought; I'm sure we'd still be having some problems, because our "Decider" would still be the same imbecilic, egotistical, hee-haw we have now...but we'd have a lot more US citizens alive and home with their families, and a whole heck of a lot more Iraqis alive!!!

2007-05-03 19:05:26 · answer #1 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 1 5

initially, the US (Bush) has been stirring the pot and shaking the hornet's nest for particularly a while, all pre 9-11. and that they stupidly proceed to accomplish that. in case you play with fire, you will get burned. annoying which you are the rustic to which others ought to regulate to and denouncing their government/customs isn't a practicable or favorite suited to radical extremists. One guy, and a questionable president at that can't exchange the worldwide. what's frightening is that Bush thinks he can. he's in over his head, the worldwide is in danger, terror assaults are growing to be around the globe, and harmless everybody is death on a regular basis. you won't be able to stress different international places via telling them they are the two "For or against you". i'm prepared to wager the main significant terror assaults on London might have in no way got here approximately if Blair did no longer connect Bush's marketing campaign. that's a dropping conflict, and invading Iraq had no result on terrorism (Doh!). fairly, i've got confidence it has began a perilous worldwide conflict which has replaced the worldwide continuously. I certainly have heard all styles of conspiracy theories with regard to the actual undeniable fact that Bush knew approximately 9-11 yet did no longer react or enable it happen so he would desire to conquer Iraq in his "conflict on Terror". At this factor, the completed project is loopy inspite of the certainty. you won't be able to combat a dropping conflict. each and every from time to time you fairly would desire to grant in, supply them what they elect, and count extensive style your losses. The dying count extensive style does not would desire to proceed to climb.

2017-01-09 11:09:25 · answer #2 · answered by ayachi 3 · 0 0

You have a better imagination than me. That's as good a fantasy as any though, I like the sound of it.

I think we'd be closer to war with Iran though if we weren't bogged down in Iraq. I think Iraq is forcing diplomacy with Iran, for now. Although, if we pull out of Iraq, we're closer to war with Iran. Strange irony.

2007-05-03 19:01:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Well, would you look at that? Yahoo Liberals are now pretending like they know EXACTLY what would have happened if we hadn't invaded Iraq. They're now fantasizing about what would have never been. They're now entirely sure that their vivid and extremely misguided imaginations are realistic.

Words can't describe how pathetically fascinating that is.

2007-05-03 19:43:41 · answer #4 · answered by Emma 6 · 2 1

Yeah but I just imagine the wives and daughters who havent been raped and sodimized by Saddam's brutal regime ..no torture chambers, his son will not be raping the bride of the family friend on the day of her wedding causing the groom to kill himself (documented fact). I bet you would have loved to live there back then when anything you said or did could be turned into an instant death sentence for you or anyone else in your family . Take the money sent from other countries for aid and build yourself another gold palace or two , build some more weapons to take over Kuwait, spread the poisonous gas to neighboring countries and kill the children. On the first day of becoming leader of Iraq in 1979 , Saddam had his police round up all his imaginary enemies , take them outside during his speech and killed them on the spot . It is on video. This is the mentality of dictators and it scares me more that liberals who are so concerned about other women's rights and freedom of speech and betterment can actually defend not taking this madman out . You are unreal .

2007-05-03 18:58:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

WOW...you must live under a rock if you think the world admired us before...lol...Americans have always been dubbed arrogant and self righteous by the rest of the world.

2007-05-03 18:54:35 · answer #6 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 4 0

what planet did this question originate on?

earth to planet. earth to planet.

saddam while he was very hard on terrorist acts within his own country had helped fund and allow training camps for al-qaeda for years.

though he may or, may not have had WMD's, he did everything within his power to make us, the UN and the inspectors think he did and had played that game throughout the clinton years. he was making a laughing stock out of clinton, is what he was doing.

iran has always been exceptionally anti-american and has had fascists leaders since its inception - the more radical the better for them.

pelosi's catering to syria (another terrorist training ground and proven enemy of the west) is without a doubt making a laughing stock out of us in the world view right now.

this planet is and was not a lala-land no matter how much you'd like to think otherwise.

2007-05-03 19:08:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

3500 soldiers and a 1/2 a Trillion dollars later and now Bush say all we need to do is get some kind of civil order in Iraq and he's willing to call that a "VICTORY"!!!!!!!!

2007-05-03 18:53:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

America could have saved a lot of money that it could have paid its debts to China, Saudi Arabia and Russia.

2007-05-03 18:51:49 · answer #9 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 4

Excellent question - Yes I do think about it, and the 3500+ soldiers lives that wouldn't have been thrown away for this idiots war.

2007-05-03 18:51:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers