2007-05-03 17:36:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would watch that, even if it was on pay-per-view at $1000!
2007-05-03 17:41:54 · answer #1 · answered by ConspiracyExaminer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To paraphrase the one funny line in the otherwise awful movie Troy: Leaders fighting their own battles, wouldn't that be a sight?
If we replaced wars with single combat between leaders or their champions, how would the military-industrial complex which President Eisenhower warned us about make any money?
2007-05-03 18:27:45 · answer #2 · answered by Cacaoatl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People wouldnt honor the results of the match. Hey maybe we can start doing that with the olympics! So like if we win so many gold medals, then Iran has to disarm! Sounds good to me as long as it isnt determined by soccer. Not even the results of arbitrated politics would stir enough interest to get me watching!
2007-05-03 17:59:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would only mean that we are fair... The last time I remember any country being close to fair is the American Civil War when leaders actually fought.
2007-05-03 17:40:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
problem is it is not just the leaders, but ideas that are been fought over by both sides, so a fight by the leaders would not make a difference, since many more people are in line to pick up the baton after the leaders are gone.
2007-05-03 17:42:26 · answer #5 · answered by Krytox1a 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
2007-05-03 17:48:07 · answer #6 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's an excellent idea
2007-05-03 17:54:01 · answer #7 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Then we need to elect Arnold to be our President!
2007-05-03 17:55:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
hahahaha like Gladiators leet that would be good
2007-05-03 17:46:49 · answer #9 · answered by ausblue 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES!!! lol.
2007-05-03 17:47:03 · answer #10 · answered by squirrelgirl749 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋