English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-03 15:38:28 · 5 answers · asked by whudafxup05 2 in News & Events Current Events

there were no foods on the fridge or cabinets. Its not like they were feeding the baby with vegan food, its just there were no food at all.

2007-05-03 15:42:03 · update #1

Thats my sourse Lisa A .http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/law/2007/05/03/regen.vegans.starve.baby.wsb

Plus , I am mot atcking vegan people with this question. If the mom is not breatfeeding the baby she needs to buy formula to feed the baby, and they have to be fed every three hours. So, babies do eat.

2007-05-04 03:05:26 · update #2

5 answers

they were convicted yesterday in Cobb co. superior court. they are awaiting their sentence, most likely life in prison. not very intelligent people, if i say so.

2007-05-04 01:16:57 · answer #1 · answered by hasdad62 6 · 2 0

This isn't the first case of vegans starving a baby, to my surprise. All a baby needs is breast milk and maybe a little water. I naturally assumed that even vegans would feed breast milk to their infants. It's the natural way.

2007-05-03 22:50:16 · answer #2 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 2 2

That's not the full story. They weren't simply "vegan" parents - they were feeding their family a raw diet. I am not defending them... but you should list the accurate story.

2007-05-03 22:50:46 · answer #3 · answered by trollunderthestairs 5 · 0 0

Cite your sources, please.

And 6 week old babies, vegan or otherwise, don't eat food. So the facts you state are irrelevant. Oh, and I don't have any food in my house either. Why bother? I don't cook.

2007-05-03 22:47:13 · answer #4 · answered by Lisa A 7 · 0 2

That is a little disturbing. I mean they could have always been breastfeeding the child but exactly what was anyone eating in that house.

2007-05-03 22:46:11 · answer #5 · answered by gretphemelger 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers