THEOCONs: one part theocrat & one part Neocon?
The name "conservative" just doesn't fit them anymore. Barry Goldwater & Ronald Reagan were true conservatives but Bush & his followers are Theocracy loving Neo-conservatives which means they need a new name: Theocons. Perfect fit, don't you think? Sounds much better than "cons"?
2007-05-03 15:33:19 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe, but I think of them as delusionist.
2007-05-03 15:41:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Whatever. I'm not sure that's true, because the theocrats and the neocons really don't get along so well. Bush is the only link.
But just because these two groups are dominant right now also doesn't mean that "real" conservatives are dead. There are still a few hiding out in the catacombs waiting for this regime to pass.
2007-05-03 15:37:39 · answer #2 · answered by skip742 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
the guy has been classification for a decade, interior the shadow of Tendulkar and the greater flashy left handed style of Gangully. he's The Wall. desperate and with a defence you're able to desire to a coach a worldwide X1 to repeat. i'm thrilled he additionally holds the checklist for many slip catches - and to take that off Mark Waugh isn't advise feat the two. final time we can see him right here, yet long remembered.
2017-01-09 10:54:22 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If that the case then the liberal Party should be called what it actually is, The party of Treason.
2007-05-10 17:08:20 · answer #4 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I like Theocons
2007-05-03 15:48:44 · answer #5 · answered by Don W 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Theo (of god) Neo (neopolitan ice cream)
Theo-neo.
2007-05-03 15:40:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why do people always worry more about what the other 'side' is doing more than the REAL issues at hand?
2007-05-03 15:38:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
I really don't think I should call them what they truly are!My dear old mother would not approve.
2007-05-11 00:10:05 · answer #8 · answered by R B 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You can call it whatever you like. Why should you worry about being correct. No, it doesn't fit, but why should
knowing what you're talking about stop you? It doesn't stop most libs.
2007-05-03 15:37:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
The socialist liberals that make up the bulk of the democrats are 1000 times worse than any form of conservatism..
2007-05-03 15:38:36 · answer #10 · answered by Stan Darsh 4 · 7⤊ 4⤋
TheoFacist there is nothing Conservative about them.
HOW ABOUT THEOTARDS!!!
2007-05-11 12:54:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋