2007-05-03 15:29:56 · 20 answers · asked by 451 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
oh by the way i love the answers people but some of you really need help.
2007-05-04 01:59:20 · update #1
chi guy! who was in office before that and could have had bin ladens head on a platter more than once but decided to just launch a couple of cruise missles. and many of you on the liberal side seem to forget that 2 embassies and the uss cole were both attacked during clintons watch. No Bush is not the great protector but we've been more secure here than if Kerry would have won last time. And someone from the " liberal" side of the fence please enlighten me as to why hillary and obama and thier socialist ideas would be such a good idea for our great democracy.
2007-05-04 02:08:24 · update #2
Why would they attack their allies?
The attacks would be in the form of completing the conversion of America - subtle but effective.
2007-05-03 15:41:40 · answer #1 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Iraq has no longer something to do with the conflict on terror. The "conflict on terror" is a advertising word.... the US has been attacked with the help of overseas terrorists, about each and every 7-9 years because the Nineteen Sixties. there is not any longer something to teach that the progression shouldn't carry good. So, till we do not get attacked till nicely after 2011 (with the help of which element somebody else would were in place of work for a minimum of two years), Bush receives no credit for no longer causing an attack previous to the historic common.
2016-11-25 00:44:29 · answer #2 · answered by giffin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you're forgetting that 9/11 happened on the Republican's watch. If you wish to go back and try to blame Clinton, be my guest. But if the Democrats win and an attack happens shortly afterward my guess is that they will reach back and blame Bush. Tit for tat.
2007-05-03 15:45:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Probably a very short time. All I know is that America will suffer greatly under Hillary or any of the ultra liberals and socialists in the dem. party.
2007-05-03 15:35:49 · answer #4 · answered by Stan Darsh 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The day after the election.
2007-05-03 15:40:11 · answer #5 · answered by Brilliant 1forHIM 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Again...here we go.
These people are terrorists. They don't care who is in office. Their goal is to destroy the white house. If it takes them 50 years, then so be it.
How naive are you?
2007-05-03 15:38:36 · answer #6 · answered by powhound 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
By whom. A crazy like the unabomber or Timothy McVeigh or are you talking about a crazy jihadist?
2007-05-03 15:34:32 · answer #7 · answered by beren 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Considering the attack of 9/11 happened over a year after Bush took office, never.
2007-05-03 15:34:41 · answer #8 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 3⤊ 7⤋
are you praying we will be attacked? does that make you a traitor? should we suggest you pack up and move to...where would you move to? sorry, i tried to play your game, can't do it it's dumb.
2007-05-03 15:37:08 · answer #9 · answered by bilez1 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The anti-abortion fundie kooks are already planting bombs - so the answer is they already are.
2007-05-03 15:37:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋