2007-05-03 15:25:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Invasion of Afghanistan stabilized. Iran, destabilized.
2007-05-03 15:28:13 · answer #1 · answered by beren 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, and Obama didn't lie to the American people either. We had justification for our intervention in Libya. Qaddafi has been an enemy of the USA for a long time plus we know that Qaddafi gives sanctuary to members of Al Qaeda. We could stand idly by and allow Libya become another Rwanda massacre. Clearly, the USA would be safer with Qaddafi gone but it would be even better if the Middle East could become a democracy because only through a Middle Eastern democracy is world peace possible. This alone makes a peace loving, anti-war Liberal like myself say the intervention was justified.
2016-04-01 07:40:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I have to split the difference. Afghanistan stabilized the world. Iraq destabilized.
2007-05-03 15:41:01 · answer #3 · answered by skip742 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Destabilize
2007-05-03 15:30:23 · answer #4 · answered by Don W 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Destabilize exponentially.
He had a shot with Afghanistan and blew it to invade Iraq.
2007-05-03 15:27:48 · answer #5 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
It destabilized it and caused terrorist recruitment to go through the roof.
2007-05-03 15:33:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Stop Spamming
2007-05-03 15:34:12 · answer #7 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Does it not bother you that these "sovereign" nations could not keep their blood lust inside their own borders?
2007-05-03 15:37:15 · answer #8 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
humm
I would offer that the situation in both countries speak for themselves. The world is certainly not stabilized....
2007-05-03 15:28:57 · answer #9 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Last week the state department (his politicized state dept.!!) announced that terrorism is up 25% since the invasion.
It bodes badly for our future.
2007-05-03 15:28:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋